Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Smart City And Healthy Walking: An Environmental Comparison Between Healthy And The Shortest Route Choices
ID_Doc 56764
Authors Kim E.J.; Gong Y.
Year 2023
Published Urban Planning, 8, 2
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6407
Abstract Walking is a means of health promotion, which is one of the main features of smart cities. A smart city’s built environment can help people choose a healthy walking route instead of the shortest one. Our study investigated which environmental factors pedestrians who select healthy routes prefer and favored environmental factors in pedestrian navigation mobile applications. Survey data were collected from 164 residents in Daegu, South Korea, from October 12 to October 25, 2022. t and chi‐square tests were used to compare perceptual differences between the healthy route and the shortest route preference groups. The results indicate that 56.7% of respondents preferred a healthy walking route over the shortest route. Pedestrians who chose the healthy route preferred to have less noise and more greenery along their commute and feel safer from traffic accidents and crimes than those who chose the shortest route. Moreover, people who favored healthy routes also considered the following environmental factors in pedestrian navigation mobile applications: (a) greenery and waterfront areas, (b) low traffic volume, and (c) safety from traffic accidents and crimes. The results suggest that urban planning and design policies support healthier and more active walking in smart cities. © 2023 by the author(s); licensee Cogitatio Press (Lisbon, Portugal).
Author Keywords built environment; healthy walking; mobile applications; pedestrian navigation; smart city; walking route


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
15560 View0.887Visvizi, A; Abdel-Razek, SA; Wosiek, R; Malik, RConceptualizing Walking And Walkability In The Smart City Through A Model Composite W<Sup>2</Sup> Smart City Utility IndexENERGIES, 14, 23 (2021)
24551 View0.885Fonseca F.; Papageorgiou G.; Conticelli E.; Jabbari M.; Ribeiro P.J.G.; Tondelli S.; Ramos R.Evaluating Attitudes And Preferences Towards Walking In Two European CitiesFuture Transportation, 4, 2 (2024)
5814 View0.881Golem S.A Walking-Friendly Environment? How To Measure ItHandbook of Research on Promoting Sustainable Public Transportation Strategies in Urban Environments (2023)
24200 View0.873Hong A.; Choi D.-A.; Chung H.; Kumar P.; Lee J.Environmental And Health Monitoring In Smart Cities: A Systematic Review Of Trends, Opportunities, And ChallengesSustainable Cities and Society, 130 (2025)
37337 View0.866Garau C.; Desogus G.; Annunziata A.; Mighela F.Mobility And Health In The Smart City 3.0: Trends And Innovations In Italian ContextSmart Cities and Digital Transformation: Empowering Communities, Limitless Innovation, Sustainable Development and the Next Generation (2023)
9550 View0.864Papageorgiou G.N.; Demetriou D.; Tsappi E.; Maimaris A.Analyzing The Requirements For Smart Pedestrian Applications: Findings From Nicosia, CyprusSmart Cities, 7, 4 (2024)
14867 View0.862Danilina N.; Hristov B.Comfortable And Safe Traffic Conditions For Pedestrians, Cyclists And E-Scooter Riders And Sustainable Land Use On City StreetsAIP Conference Proceedings, 2791, 1 (2023)
40700 View0.862Chen F.; She W.; Zeng F.; Gao M.; Wen C.; Liu G.; Wu L.; Wu Y.; Zhang C.Optimization Strategy Of Community Planning For Environmental Health And Public Health In Smart City Under Multi-ObjectivesFrontiers in Public Health, 12 (2024)
25471 View0.859Rosetia A.; Harun N.Z.Exploratory Methodological Analysis On Active Mobility In Built Environment StudiesInternational Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 19, 2 (2025)
25438 View0.858Sanchez-Sepulveda M.V.; Navarro-Martin J.; Fonseca-Escudero D.; Amo-Filva D.; Antunez-Anea F.Exploiting Urban Data To Address Real-World Challenges: Enhancing Urban Mobility For Environmental And Social Well-BeingCities, 153 (2024)