Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Evaluation Criteria Of Smart City Mobility System Using Mcdm Method
ID_Doc 24726
Authors Zapolskyte, S; Burinskiene, M; Trépanier, M
Year 2020
Published BALTIC JOURNAL OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 15, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.501
Abstract While many cities a round the world qualify themselves as "smart cities", there is no comprehensive way to evaluate to what extent they are "smart". This article proposes a framework for comparison of the level of "smartness" of the urban mobility systems. The most relevant indicators that have the greatest impact on smart mobility systems were selected in the course of literature review. The impact of indicators on smart mobility systems is variable. Evaluating smart mobility systems, different authors distinguish between different indicators, which usually do not duplicate. The paper categorizes the indicators of the smart mobility system into five groups, called "factors": motor travel and congestion reduction measures; pollution reduction measures; travel safety and accident reduction measures; traffic management tools and services; smart infrastructure measures. A number of indicators are attributed to each of the listed groups. A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making method, namely, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, has been used to evaluate the significance of the smartness level used in the research. This method bases the weighting of subjective criteria on expert judgement. Rank correlation is used to determine the consistency of expert opinions. A model has been developed to compare smart mobility systems of individual cities and their infrastructure.
Author Keywords benchmarking; intelligent infrastructure; multicriteria analysis; smart city mobility system; smartness index


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
22043 View0.932Jyothula H.; Rao Y.L.; Prasad K.V.; Usha C.; Manikyamba I.L.Effective & Smart Urban Mobility System At Low Cost2024 2nd International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering and Sciences, IC3TES 2024 (2024)
36908 View0.875Zyryanov V.Methods For Evaluation Of Mobility In Modern CitiesIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 698, 6 (2019)
60600 View0.866De Genaro Chiroli D.M.; Solek E.A.B.; Oliveira R.S.; Barboza B.M.L.; De Campos R.P.; Kovaleski J.L.; Tebecherani S.M.; Trojan F.Using Multi-Criteria Analysis For Smart City AssessmentCidades, 44 (2022)
10145 View0.858Simjanović D.J.; Vesić N.O.; Zdravković N.; Šibalija T.Applying Ahp To Smart City Development: Mobility, Healthcare, And EducationLecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (2023)
38172 View0.856Ogrodnik, KMulti-Criteria Analysis Of Smart Cities In PolandGEOGRAPHIA POLONICA, 93, 2 (2020)
46596 View0.855Maria Nancy A.; Vinoth N.A.S.; Sargunan K.; Alex Rajesh A.; Alaskar K.; Raviteja Kanakala V.Revolutionizing Urban Mobility: An Overview Of Intelligent Transportation Systems In Smart CitiesProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications, ICIRCA 2023 (2023)
29029 View0.854Lee J.; Yoon Y.Hierarchy Table Of Indicators And Measures For The Current Status Assessment Of Urban Roads In Smart CitiesSustainable Cities and Society, 77 (2022)
2773 View0.851Silva R.R.D.; Santos G.D.; Setti D.A Multi-Criteria Approach For Urban Mobility Project Selection In Medium-Sized CitiesSustainable Cities and Society, 86 (2022)
35014 View0.85Jirmanová M.; Novotný V.; Dousková N.Level Of Service Of Public Transport Operation - Pilot StudyActa Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 41 (2023)