Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title	Effective & Smart Urban Mobility System At Low Cost
ID_Doc	22043
Authors	Jyothula H.; Rao Y.L.; Prasad K.V.; Usha C.; Manikyamba I.L.
Year	2024
Published	2024 2nd International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering and Sciences, IC3TES 2024
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IC3TES62412.2024.10877487
Abstract	There is no established metric for measuring urban smartness at this time. Various writers use various metrics to assess smart city transportation systems. The assessment indicators for the transport system that were offered in the scholarly works were reviewed, and the most relevant and impactful indicators were chosen. A hierarchical assessment model for smart city transport systems is developed in this paper. There are five categories, or "factors,"that the indications fall into. Several indicators are assigned to each of the categories. This study used the hybrid MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making) method to evaluate urban transport systems and identify which of the given characteristics were most important. Top Priority Sorting based on Ideal Solution Similarity (TOPSIS), COPRAS, and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) were the multi-criteria assessment methods in use. The importance of the components and indicators was determined using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP), rankings (prioritization), and direct evaluation (experts evaluate each criterion as a percentage; total assessments of all criteria equal 100%). There were two phases to the evaluation and comparison of mobility systems: first, smart mobility systems were evaluated comprehensively according to the integrated importance of the indicators; and second, multi-criteria evaluations were conducted according to the indicators of every factor separately. Based on the amount of intelligence, a top city is determined and rated. Building a hierarchical model for evaluating smart transportation systems is the focus of this paper. © 2024 IEEE.
Author Keywords	Evaluation smart transportation; MCDM; Smart City; Smart Mobility System; Urban smartness

Similar Articles

Id	Similarity	Authors	Title	Published
24726	0.932	Zapolskyte, S; Burinskiene, M; Trépanier, M	Evaluation Criteria Of Smart City Mobility System Using Mcdm Method	BALTIC JOURNAL OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 15, 4 (2020)
36908	0.895	Zyryanov V.	Methods For Evaluation Of Mobility In Modern Cities	IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 698, 6 (2019)
2773	0.887	Silva R.R.D.; Santos G.D.; Setti D.	A Multi-Criteria Approach For Urban Mobility Project Selection In Medium-Sized Cities	Sustainable Cities and Society, 86 (2022)
29029	0.884	Lee J.; Yoon Y.	Hierarchy Table Of Indicators And Measures For The Current Status Assessment Of Urban Roads In Smart Cities	Sustainable Cities and Society, 77 (2022)
60600	0.88	De Genaro Chiroli D.M.; Solek E.A.B.; Oliveira R.S.; Barboza B.M.L.; De Campos R.P.; Kovaleski J.L.; Tebecherani S.M.; Trojan F.	Using Multi-Criteria Analysis For Smart City Assessment	Cidades, 44 (2022)
38173	0.876	Hajduk, S	Multi-Criteria Analysis Of Smart Cities On The Example Of The Polish Cities	RESOURCES-BASEL, 10, 5 (2021)
46596	0.871	Maria Nancy A.; Vinoth N.A.S.; Sargunan K.; Alex Rajesh A.; Alaskar K.; Raviteja Kanakala V.	Revolutionizing Urban Mobility: An Overview Of Intelligent Transportation Systems In Smart Cities	Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications, ICIRCA 2023 (2023)
30021	0.865	Pop M.D.; Protean O.	Identification Of Significant Metrics And Indicators For Smart Mobility	IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 477, 1 (2019)
37998	0.864	Mutavdžija M.; Kovačić M.; Buntak K.	Moving Towards Sustainable Mobility: A Comparative Analysis Of Smart Urban Mobility In Croatian Cities	Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16, 5 (2024)
35014	0.864	Jirmanová M.; Novotný V.; Dousková N.	Level Of Service Of Public Transport Operation - Pilot Study	Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 41 (2023)