Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Hierarchy Table Of Indicators And Measures For The Current Status Assessment Of Urban Roads In Smart Cities
ID_Doc 29029
Authors Lee J.; Yoon Y.
Year 2022
Published Sustainable Cities and Society, 77
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103532
Abstract Urban roads integrated with modern, innovative technologies (called advanced systems) serve as one of the primary service areas to support the function of a smart city. The extensive experience with the benefits that these advanced urban roads provide informs decision-makers toward efficient investments in advanced systems for urban roads. However, there is no tool designed to evaluate the developmental status of urban roads in a smart city. Therefore, this study has developed a hierarchy table of indicators and measures specific to assessing the current status of urban road innovation for smart cities. A keyword network analysis was used to develop the hierarchy table. The procedures take three phases: data preparation, data analysis, and hierarchy table development. As a result, the hierarchy table includes 53 measures in 14 indicators connected to the five smart city components (e.g., environment, mobility, governance, economy, and living). The hierarchy table can be used for city officials to assess the current status of urban roads in the transition of a smart city, which leads to an explicit investment decision on urban road innovation. The procedures presented in this study can be adapted to develop indicators and measures for other service areas necessary for a smart city.
Author Keywords Hierarchy table; Service areas; Smart cities; Smart city indexes; Urban roads innovation


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
22043 View0.884Jyothula H.; Rao Y.L.; Prasad K.V.; Usha C.; Manikyamba I.L.Effective & Smart Urban Mobility System At Low Cost2024 2nd International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering and Sciences, IC3TES 2024 (2024)
16575 View0.86Massara B.; Santo K.Critical Mapping Of Indicators For Smart Cities EvaluationIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 503, 1 (2020)
6885 View0.856Surbakti E.E.; Tobing F.A.T.; Prisalia R.; Septa R.Ahp Hierarchy Structure For Indicators Of Smart City Implementation In IndonesiaProceedings of 2nd 2021 International Conference on Smart Cities, Automation and Intelligent Computing Systems, ICON-SONICS 2021 (2021)
24726 View0.854Zapolskyte, S; Burinskiene, M; Trépanier, MEvaluation Criteria Of Smart City Mobility System Using Mcdm MethodBALTIC JOURNAL OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 15, 4 (2020)
60600 View0.851De Genaro Chiroli D.M.; Solek E.A.B.; Oliveira R.S.; Barboza B.M.L.; De Campos R.P.; Kovaleski J.L.; Tebecherani S.M.; Trojan F.Using Multi-Criteria Analysis For Smart City AssessmentCidades, 44 (2022)
36582 View0.85Lai C.M.T.; Cole A.Measuring Progress Of Smart Cities: Indexing The Smart City IndicesUrban Governance, 3, 1 (2023)
52452 View0.85Ates M.; Akin S.Spatial Formation Potential Of The Smart City Concept: New Smart Cities And Their Evaluation With The Ahp MethodiCivil Engineering and Architecture, 12, 6 (2024)