Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Why Government Supported Smart City Initiatives Fail: Examining Community Risk And Benefit Agreements As A Missing Link To Accountability For Equity-Seeking Groups
ID_Doc 61842
Authors Sengupta U.; Sengupta U.
Year 2022
Published Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.960400
Abstract This paper utilizes concepts from a critical social justice discourse on smart cities to identify factors behind resistance to new smart city initiatives from equity-seeking groups. The broader critical discourse is examined based on relevance to the eventual failure of the initiatives selected as case studies. It highlights institutional failure within government-supported initiatives due to the lack of consideration given to equitable distribution of risks and formal accountability mechanisms. It describes outcomes surrounding smart cities in which the benefits accrue to some groups within the city while risks increase for other groups. Finally, we examine the integration of “risk” as an adaptation to the existing practical mechanism of Community Benefit Agreements, for use of this framework to support value sensitive design approaches in future smart city initiatives. Copyright © 2022 Sengupta and Sengupta.
Author Keywords community benefits agreement; institutional failure; smart cities; social justice; value sensitive design


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
14110 View0.891Kitchin R.; Cardullo P.; Feliciantonio C.D.Citizenship, Justice, And The Right To The Smart CityThe Right to the Smart City (2019)
16799 View0.89Masoni A.Cultural Biases In The Smart City: Implications And ChallengesAdvances in Science, Technology and Innovation (2024)
49398 View0.887Durga K.S.; Murty A.V.N.; Kesalu S.V.; Chandra D.; Mishra P.; Upadhyay M.; Rao A.V.S.S.R.Smart Cities And Social Equity: A Data Science Perspective On Urban DevelopmentJournal of Applied Bioanalysis, 11, 3 (2025)
43276 View0.887Bunders, DJ; Varró, KProblematizing Data-Driven Urban Practices: Insights From Five Dutch 'Smart Cities'CITIES, 93 (2019)
25092 View0.885Ciesielska M.; Ortiz A.S.Examining Failure Of Smart City Public Value Co-Creation: The Role Of Institutional CommitmentACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2023)
41423 View0.885Kesar P.; Ache (Peter) P.M.Past, Present And Future Of The Smart City In India: An Institutional PerspectiveCities, 146 (2024)
28179 View0.885Meijer, A; Bolívar, MPRGoverning The Smart City: A Review Of The Literature On Smart Urban GovernanceINTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 82, 2 (2016)
50058 View0.881Lee J.; Babcock J.; Pham T.S.; Bui T.H.; Kang M.Smart City As A Social Transition Towards Inclusive Development Through Technology: A Tale Of Four Smart CitiesInternational Journal of Urban Sciences, 27, S1 (2023)
49559 View0.88Bittencourt J.C.N.; Costa D.G.; Portugal P.; Vasques F.Smart Cities For Equitable Societies: Promoting Digital Equality, Trust, And Ethical Governance2024 IEEE Smart Cities Futures Summit, SCFC 2024 (2024)
14957 View0.879Zhilin S.; Klievink B.; de Jong M.Community Self-Governance In The Smart City: Towards A TypologyPublic Administration and Information Technology, 34 (2019)