Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Examining Failure Of Smart City Public Value Co-Creation: The Role Of Institutional Commitment
ID_Doc 25092
Authors Ciesielska M.; Ortiz A.S.
Year 2023
Published ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598520
Abstract The concept of a smart city holds a great promise for prosperity for its residents by delivering them public value that satisfies their needs. But the reality falls far from the vision, as the implementation of ambitious goals in the form of smart city projects in subcontracting mode occurs in complicated socio-techno-political settings, which often end up in failure. Institutional facets of political commitment and its impact on public value creation are not fully recognized. To close this gap, this study adopts the approach of political commitment to identify and analyze those elements that could hinder the provision of public value in a smart city project. To do so, we perform a qualitative analysis of four smart city initiatives' failures in different countries. The findings reveal that particular elements associated with political commitment in subcontracting projects impact public value provision in smart city initiatives. Particularly, the key role of the continuation of political commitment in its institutionalization phase leads to a loss of public value within strategic, political, and financial spheres. Our study contributes to better recognition of institutional settings that contribute to smart city initiatives' failure. © 2023 Owner/Author.
Author Keywords co-creation; commitment; institution; smart city


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
61842 View0.885Sengupta U.; Sengupta U.Why Government Supported Smart City Initiatives Fail: Examining Community Risk And Benefit Agreements As A Missing Link To Accountability For Equity-Seeking GroupsFrontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4 (2022)
28155 View0.884Bolívar, MPRGovernance Models And Outcomes To Foster Public Value Creation In Smart CitiesDG.O 2017: THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH: INNOVATIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNMENT (2017)
28152 View0.88Pereira G.V.; Luna-Reyes L.F.; Gil-Garcia J.R.Governance Innovations, Digital Transformation And The Generation Of Public Value In Smart City InitiativesACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2020)
12838 View0.879Akgün E.Z.; Gerli P.; Mora L.; McTigue C.Breaking Barriers For Breaking Ground: A Categorisation Of Public Sector Challenges To Smart City Project ImplementationPublic Policy and Administration (2024)
41423 View0.879Kesar P.; Ache (Peter) P.M.Past, Present And Future Of The Smart City In India: An Institutional PerspectiveCities, 146 (2024)
43728 View0.877Neuroni A.C.; Haller S.; van Winden W.; Carabias-Hütter V.; Yildirim O.Public Value Creation In A Smart City Context: An Analysis FrameworkPublic Administration and Information Technology, 35 (2019)
40197 View0.875Ferraris, A; Santoro, G; Pellicelli, ACOpenness Of Public Governments In Smart Cities: Removing The Barriers For Innovation And EntrepreneurshipINTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 16, 4 (2020)
50466 View0.874Meijer, AJ; Gil-Garcia, JR; Bolívar, MPRSmart City Research: Contextual Conditions, Governance Models, And Public Value AssessmentSOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 34, 6 (2016)
59021 View0.874Lebrument, N; Zumbo-Lebrument, C; Rochette, C; Roulet, TJTriggering Participation In Smart Cities: Political Efficacy, Public Administration Satisfaction And Sense Of Belonging As Drivers Of Citizens' IntentionTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 171 (2021)
1596 View0.87Dolmans S.A.M.; van Galen W.P.L.; Walrave B.; den Ouden E.; Valkenburg R.; Romme A.G.L.A Dynamic Perspective On Collaborative Innovation For Smart City Development: The Role Of Uncertainty, Governance, And Institutional LogicsOrganization Studies, 44, 10 (2023)