Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Platformization Of Public Participation: Considerations For Urban Planners Navigating New Engagement Tools
ID_Doc 56226
Authors Robinson P.; Johnson P.
Year 2023
Published Urban Book Series, Part F270
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31746-0_5
Abstract Professional urban planners have an ethical obligation to work in the public interest. Public input and critique gathered at public meetings and other channels are used to inform planning recommendations to elected officials. Pre-pandemic, the planning profession worked with digital tools, but in-person meetings were the dominant form of public participation. The pandemic imposed a shift to digital channels and tools, with the result that planners’ use of technology risks unitizing public participation. As the use of new platforms for public participation expands, we argue it has the potential to fundamentally change participation, a process we call platformization. We frame this as a subset of the broader emergence of platform urbanism. This chapter evaluates six public participation platforms, identifying how the tools they provide map onto key participation frameworks from Arnstein (1969), Fung (2006), and IAP2 (2018). Through this analysis, we examine how the platformization of public participation poses ethical and scholarly challenges to the work of professional planners. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Author Keywords Platform urbanism; Public participation; Smart cities; Urban planning


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
42218 View0.903Katmada A.; Katsavounidou G.; Kakderi C.Platform Urbanism For SustainabilityLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 14037 LNCS (2023)
56729 View0.899Abel P.; Miether D.; Plötzky F.; Robra-Bissantz S.The Shape Of Bottom-Up Urbanism Participatory Platforms: A Conceptualisation And Empirical Study34th Bled eConference: Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change, BLED 2021 - Proceedings (2021)
56730 View0.883Abel P.; Herrmann D.; Hinz A.; Robra-Bissantz S.The Shape Of Participatory Platforms For Bottom-Up Urbanism: A Definition And Study For Success Factors33rd Bled eConference: Enabling Technology for a Sustainable Society, BLED 2020 - Proceedings (2020)
31799 View0.881Krisch A.Institutionalizing Digital Infrastructures: Discursive Institutionalization Of Public Platforms In ViennaEuropean Journal of Spatial Development, 19, 3 (2022)
20067 View0.871Akers M.A.A.Digital Placemaking: An Analysis Of Citizen Participation In Smart CitiesSmart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 294 (2022)
55494 View0.87Repette P.; Sabatini-Marques J.; Yigitcanlar T.; Sell D.; Costa E.The Evolution Of City-As-A-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance With Collective Knowledge-Based Platform UrbanismLand, 10, 1 (2021)
24653 View0.869Senior C.; Temeljotov Salaj A.; Johansen A.; Lohne J.Evaluating The Impact Of Public Participation Processes On Participants In Smart City Development: A Scoping ReviewBuildings, 13, 6 (2023)
20083 View0.869Suter A.; Kaiser L.; Dušek M.; Hasler F.; Tappert S.Digital Rights To The City: Local Practices And Negotiations Of Urban Space On DecidimUrban Planning, 9 (2024)
51865 View0.867Abdouni L.Smartifying [Informal] Cities Through Platform UrbanismSmart Cities to Smart Societies: Moving beyond Technology (2025)
47154 View0.865Odendaal N.Ruptures And Departures: An Emancipatory Perspective On Planning And TechnologyCritical Planning Futures: New Directions in Planning Theory (2025)