Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Place Of Co-Production: A Physital Space For Collaborative Urban Government
ID_Doc 56220
Authors Ravid B.Y.; Gutman M.A.
Year 2024
Published Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123748
Abstract Many studies investigating urban government co-production focus on definitions and applications and often overlook the physical locations where this co-production occurs. This study introduces “physital” spaces—a synthesis of physical and digital elements—to enhance participatory urban governance. The research was guided by the following question: How can a space combining architecture and visualization technologies foster a new culture of collaboration between government and citizens in shaping urban policy? By employing architectural research methodologies that analyze a space's human behavior, the study considers a physital space in the Haifa neighborhood of Hadar with the aim of facilitating collaboration between municipal employees and civil society. The research is a Participatory Action Research (PAR) study and had three stages: designing the physital space; implementing a participation protocol to explore the functionality of the physital space in shaping urban-social policy; and critically reflecting on the emerging cultural dynamics within this innovative setting. The findings indicate that physital space not only fosters effective grouping and community bonding through its oval structure and interactive setup but also motivates participants to engage in dynamic co-production. The study challenges current Smart City paradigms that often limit real community involvement in decision making spaces, demonstrating how physital spaces can bridge the gap between theoretical urban governance and practical, inclusive policy making. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
Author Keywords Civic architecture; Digital Twin; Physital space; Smart city; Urban government


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
14891 View0.87Charitonidou M.Commoning Practices And Mobility Justice In Data-Driven Societies: Urban Scale Digital Twins And Their Challenges For Architecture And Urban PlanningTowards a New European Bauhaus—Challenges in Design Education: EAAE Annual Conference—Madrid 2022 (2024)
32068 View0.866Qanazi S.; Leclerc E.; Bosredon P.Integrating Social Dimensions Into Urban Digital Twins: A Review And Proposed Framework For Social Digital TwinsSmart Cities, 8, 1 (2025)
29352 View0.862Esposito G.; Bertello A.; Mora L.; Tucek D.How Do Boundary Objects Influence People-Centered Smart Cities? A Systematic Literature ReviewReview of Managerial Science (2025)
59924 View0.861Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo J.Urban Digital Twins And Metaverses Towards City Multiplicities: Uniting Or Dividing Urban Experiences?Ethics and Information Technology, 27, 1 (2025)
41346 View0.861Nochta T.; Oti-Sarpong K.Participation Matters: The Social Construction Of Digital Twins For CitiesEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science (2024)
25335 View0.859Voorwinden A.; van Bueren E.; Verhoef L.Experimenting With Collaboration In The Smart City: Legal And Governance Structures Of Urban Living LabsGovernment Information Quarterly, 40, 4 (2023)
10666 View0.858Haraguchi M.; Funahashi T.; Biljecki F.Assessing Governance Implications Of City Digital Twin Technology: A Maturity Model ApproachTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 204 (2024)
42559 View0.858Castelnovo W.; Romanelli M.Power Relationships In The Co-Production Of Smart City InitiativesLecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 37 (2021)
20019 View0.858Li L.; Lin X.; Yang X.; Luo Z.; Wang M.Digital Governance And Urban Government Service Spaces: Understanding Resident Interaction And Perception In Chinese CitiesLand, 13, 9 (2024)
50295 View0.856Miao J.T.; Aritenang A.F.; Gissma N.Smart City In The Creativity-Built Environment Nexus: A Case Study Of BandungRoutledge Companion to Creativity and the Built Environment (2024)