Smart City Gnosys
Smart city article details
| Title | Integrating Social Dimensions Into Urban Digital Twins: A Review And Proposed Framework For Social Digital Twins |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 32068 |
| Authors | Qanazi S.; Leclerc E.; Bosredon P. |
| Year | 2025 |
| Published | Smart Cities, 8, 1 |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8010023 |
| Abstract | Highlights: What are the main accomplishments of this study? Provides a comprehensive literature review on social digital twin (SDT) concepts, features, key technologies, and analytical tools, and highlights research gaps and practical challenges. Proposes an SDT framework and governance model designed to address the limitations of current urban digital twins (UDTs) by integrating social dimensions throughout the process. What are the implications of this study? Transforms UDTs by advancing dynamic, holistic models that go beyond representing physical “spaces” to capturing the full “place”, including both physical and social dimensions, in real time. This improves the conceptualization, modeling, and practical applications of SDTs. Promotes a socially inclusive governance model for smart city management through the SDT framework, offering valuable guidance for researchers, decision-makers, and technology developers, while enabling cities to better meet urban social needs. The rapid evolution of smart city technologies has expanded digital twin (DT) applications from industrial to urban contexts. However, current urban digital twins (UDTs) remain predominantly focused on the physical aspects of urban environments (“spaces”), often overlooking the interwoven social dimensions that shape the concept of “place”. This limitation restricts their ability to fully represent the complex interplay between physical and social systems in urban settings. To address this gap, this paper introduces the concept of the social digital twin (SDT), which integrates social dimensions into UDTs to bridge the divide between technological systems and the lived urban experience. Drawing on an extensive literature review, the study defines key components for transitioning from UDTs to SDTs, including conceptualization and modeling of human interactions (geo-individuals and geo-socials), social applications, participatory governance, and community engagement. Additionally, it identifies essential technologies and analytical tools for implementing SDTs, outlines research gaps and practical challenges, and proposes a framework for integrating social dynamics within UDTs. This framework emphasizes the importance of active community participation through a governance model and offers a comprehensive methodology to support researchers, technology developers, and policymakers in advancing SDT research and practical applications. © 2025 by the authors. |
| Author Keywords | citizen participation; framework; human digital twin; smart city; smart governance; social digital twin; urban digital twin |
Similar Articles
| Id | Similarity | Authors | Title | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
56880  | 0.931 | Yossef Ravid B.; Aharon-Gutman M. | The Social Digital Twin:The Social Turn In The Field Of Smart Cities | Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50, 6 (2023) |
| 59924 | 0.928 | Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo J. | Urban Digital Twins And Metaverses Towards City Multiplicities: Uniting Or Dividing Urban Experiences? | Ethics and Information Technology, 27, 1 (2025) |
| 10666 | 0.926 | Haraguchi M.; Funahashi T.; Biljecki F. | Assessing Governance Implications Of City Digital Twin Technology: A Maturity Model Approach | Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 204 (2024) |
| 57598 | 0.922 | Qanazi S.; Leclerc E.; Bosredon P. | Toward A Comprehensive Definition Of Urban Digital Twins: Bridging Gaps For Smart City Development | Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1310 LNNS (2025) |
| 41346 | 0.922 | Nochta T.; Oti-Sarpong K. | Participation Matters: The Social Construction Of Digital Twins For Cities | Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science (2024) |
| 4227 | 0.919 | Mazzetto S. | A Review Of Urban Digital Twins Integration, Challenges, And Future Directions In Smart City Development | Sustainability (Switzerland), 16, 19 (2024) |
| 59922 | 0.919 | Weil C.; Bibri S.E.; Longchamp R.; Golay F.; Alahi A. | Urban Digital Twin Challenges: A Systematic Review And Perspectives For Sustainable Smart Cities | Sustainable Cities and Society, 99 (2023) |
| 35448 | 0.915 | Raes L.; Concilio G.; Doran C.; Temmerman L.; Crompvoets J. | Local Digital Twins For Smart Cities: Opportunities For Evidence-Informed Decision-Making | Decide Better: Open and Interoperable Local Digital Twins (2025) |
| 59925 | 0.913 | Dembski, F; Wössner, U; Letzgus, M; Ruddat, M; Yamu, C | Urban Digital Twins For Smart Cities And Citizens: The Case Study Of Herrenberg, Germany | SUSTAINABILITY, 12, 6 (2020) |
| 38882 | 0.909 | Peldon D.; Banihashemi S.; LeNguyen K.; Derrible S. | Navigating Urban Complexity: The Transformative Role Of Digital Twins In Smart City Development | Sustainable Cities and Society, 111 (2024) |