Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Effect Of Perceived Risk On Public Participation Intention In Smart City Development: Evidence From China
ID_Doc 55390
Authors Cui Q.; Wei R.; Huang R.; Hu X.; Wang G.
Year 2022
Published Land, 11, 9
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land11091604
Abstract Smart city development aims at sustainable development and high quality of urban life, which requires the participation of stakeholders. As a crucial stakeholder involved, the public's key role has been widely concerned. However, a lack of public participation in smart city development still exists due to perceived risk. In order to solve the insufficient public participation in smart city development, this study will identify the perceived risk and explore its influential impact. After defining the concept of perceived risk, this paper constructs a theoretical model concerning the effect of perceived risk on public participation intention based on the theory of reasoned action. On the basis of 193 empirical data from China, the structural equation model is applied to test the influential impact of perceived risk on the public participation intention in smart city development. The results show that the perceived risk has a significantly negative effect on public participation intention, attitude, and subjective norms, while behavioral attitude and subjective norms have positive effects on public participation intention. According to empirical research results, the risk prevention paths and methods of public participation in smart city development are proposed so as to provide useful implications for further public participation practice in smart city development.
Author Keywords empirical research; perceived risk; public participation; smart city development; the theory of reasoned action


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
33437 View0.915Wang Y.; Zhang Y.; Zhang W.; Zhang T.Investigating The Public'S Willingness To Participate In The Construction Of Smart Cities: Evidence From ChinaOpen House International, 49, 1 (2024)
22654 View0.9Ling P.-S.; Lim S.B.; Wong S.Y.; Ritchie D.S.Elevating Malaysian Public Willingness In Smart City Development Supported By Governmental InitiativesOpen House International (2025)
53445 View0.888Cai Y.; Luo X.; Lai J.Study On Public Participation Intention And Influencing Factors Of Smart City Construction In Dongguan CityProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 13575 (2025)
29479 View0.887Mutambik, I; Almuqrin, A; Alharbi, F; Abusharhah, MHow To Encourage Public Engagement In Smart City Development-Learning From Saudi ArabiaLAND, 12, 10 (2023)
59021 View0.887Lebrument, N; Zumbo-Lebrument, C; Rochette, C; Roulet, TJTriggering Participation In Smart Cities: Political Efficacy, Public Administration Satisfaction And Sense Of Belonging As Drivers Of Citizens' IntentionTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 171 (2021)
24653 View0.882Senior C.; Temeljotov Salaj A.; Johansen A.; Lohne J.Evaluating The Impact Of Public Participation Processes On Participants In Smart City Development: A Scoping ReviewBuildings, 13, 6 (2023)
10661 View0.876Wirsbinna, A; Grega, L; Juenger, MAssessing Factors Influencing Citizens' Behavioral Intention Towards Smart City LivingSMART CITIES, 6, 6 (2023)
25514 View0.873Gu T.; Hao E.; Zhang L.Exploring Determinants Of Residents’ Participation Intention Towards Smart Community Construction By Extending The Tpb: A Case Study Of Shenzhen CityEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management (2024)
49380 View0.871Shi, XR; Ling, GHT; Alalouch, C; Leng, PC; Lim, SB; Rashid, MFA; Rahmat, ASmart Cities And Public Participation: A Bibliometric Analysis And Conceptualization Of The Social-Ecological System FrameworkOPEN HOUSE INTERNATIONAL-SUSTAINABLE & SMART ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN STUDIES (2025)
55542 View0.869Shayan S.; Kim K.P.; Ma T.; Nguyen T.H.D.The First Two Decades Of Smart City Research From A Risk PerspectiveSustainability (Switzerland), 12, 21 (2020)