Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Smart Urbanization In India: Engagement, Participation, And Citizenship In Pune Smart City
ID_Doc 51689
Authors Ravi C.; Pathak P.; Gandhi P.
Year 2025
Published Inclusive Cities and Global Urban Transformation: Infrastructures, Intersectionalities, and Sustainable Development
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7521-7_3
Abstract The chapter examines the particular type of urbanization favored by the smart city paradigm; India’s Smart Cities Mission; and the top-down, elite-centered, citizen engagement it has created in Pune city. The chapter begins by summarizing the smart city development approach’s focus on capacity-building, mobility, and smart governance. It then looks at India’s flagship Smart Cities Mission and its attempts to engage citizens through extensive deployment of ICT tools. Such attempts have met with very limited success owing to the top-down nature of decision-making by policymakers, digital divide in terms of gadget ownership, and online portal designs primarily geared towards information dissemination rather than active citizen engagement in the planning process. The chapter focuses in particular on the city of Pune and uses data gathered from a survey of 310 respondents from 2020 to 2021 to highlight the limitations of top-down communication strategy that is unable to equalize caste, class, gender, and digital access-related differences. The result is a citizen engagement process that fails to engage a variety of stakeholders, confers disproportionate influence on elite English-speaking, caste-class privileged, tech-savvy citizens with better access and ability to navigate ICT tools. Thus, the planning process for smart city development in Pune highlights the preference of administrators to rely on ICT tools for citizen engagement due to their ease of deployment but such convenience-based thinking selects for elite citizens and blocks out the voices of the poor and marginalized, thus resulting in a narrow technocratic governance over a more democratic collaborative governance. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2025.
Author Keywords


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
59993 View0.903Mullick M.; Patnaik A.Urban Governance, Technologically Equipped Citizens, And Their (Non) Participation In The Indian Smart Cities Of Bhubaneswar And BhopalGeoJournal, 89, 4 (2024)
50256 View0.887Jaiwant S.V.; Dheepa T.; Haridasan A.Smart City Governance And Citizen EngagementArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Development: Innovations, Challenges, and Applications (2024)
61707 View0.887Prasad, D; Alizadeh, TWhat Makes Indian Cities Smart? A Policy Analysis Of Smart Cities MissionTELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 55 (2020)
38941 View0.886Mullick M.; Patnaik A.Negotiating Urban Entities: Marginalized Citizens, Participation, And The Indian Smart CityInternational Journal of Urban Sciences (2024)
10357 View0.885Praharaj, SArea-Based Urban Renewal Approach For Smart Cities Development In India: Challenges Of Inclusion And SustainabilityURBAN PLANNING, 6, 4 (2021)
56820 View0.883Rehena Z.; Janssen M.The Smart City Of PuneSmart City Emergence: Cases From Around the World (2019)
41423 View0.882Kesar P.; Ache (Peter) P.M.Past, Present And Future Of The Smart City In India: An Institutional PerspectiveCities, 146 (2024)
50030 View0.881Bastos D.; Fernández-Caballero A.; Pereira A.; Rocha N.P.Smart City Applications To Promote Citizen Participation In City Management And Governance: A Systematic ReviewInformatics, 9, 4 (2022)
25743 View0.877Das, DKExploring The Politico-Cultural Dimensions For Development Of Smart Cities In IndiaINTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 5, 3 (2017)
50432 View0.877Tripathy P.; Chauhan K.A.; Khambete A.K.Smart City Project Selection, Prioritization, Customization And Implementation—Voice Of Smart Citizens Case Study Of Bhubaneswar And SuratAdvances in 21st Century Human Settlements (2017)