Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Urban Governance, Technologically Equipped Citizens, And Their (Non) Participation In The Indian Smart Cities Of Bhubaneswar And Bhopal
ID_Doc 59993
Authors Mullick M.; Patnaik A.
Year 2024
Published GeoJournal, 89, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11191-7
Abstract India's Smart Cities Mission (SCM) asserts to provide participatory spaces to its citizens for urban governance. Adding to these discourses, scholars reflect on smart citizens, assuming they are technologically equipped to benefit from the SCM. However, there is a lack of detailed empirical account of the technologically equipped Indian citizen’s experience of the nature and provision of these participatory spaces within smart cities. Hence, the paper explores the nature of technologically equipped citizen participation (or non-participation) within Indian smart cities’ participatory spaces. The categories of citizen participation and experience will help understand the factors influencing stakeholder engagement. We draw from Cardullo and Kitchin's (Geo Journal 84:1–13, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8) ‘Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation’ to assess the Indian context, in which we focus on the technologically equipped citizens of the smart cities of Bhubaneswar and Bhopal, primarily for their citizen-centric proposals. Between January and July 2022, an online survey was conducted of 252 participants representing the technologically equipped urban population of the two selected cities. The data was analysed using quantitative descriptive statistics and summative content analysis. In inference, the study highlights that 'propertied citizenship' does not correspond to active citizen participation in urban governance in the two cities. The study identifies this propertied, technologically equipped citizen typology as Nishkriya or passive citizens. Thus, the study suggests that even for a technologically equipped citizen, the city and governance structures need to put in place structures for participation that are meaningful and long-term. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.
Author Keywords Citizen participation; Indian smart cities; Participatory spaces; Smart citizens


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
38941 View0.916Mullick M.; Patnaik A.Negotiating Urban Entities: Marginalized Citizens, Participation, And The Indian Smart CityInternational Journal of Urban Sciences (2024)
25480 View0.907Das D.K.Exploring An Ict-Enabled Participative Smart City Governance System: An Indian ContextInternational Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 16, 1 (2024)
18279 View0.907Waghmare, MDemocratic Participation And Smart City Citizenship In Emerging Economies - Case Of Smart Cities In IndiaCITIES, 148 (2024)
51689 View0.903Ravi C.; Pathak P.; Gandhi P.Smart Urbanization In India: Engagement, Participation, And Citizenship In Pune Smart CityInclusive Cities and Global Urban Transformation: Infrastructures, Intersectionalities, and Sustainable Development (2025)
41 View0.903Kumar, D'Smart Cities' And CitizenshipINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES, 9, 3 (2022)
52056 View0.893Effing, R; Groot, BPSocial Smart City: Introducing Digital And Social Strategies For Participatory Governance In Smart CitiesELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, EGOV 2016, 9820 (2019)
41423 View0.893Kesar P.; Ache (Peter) P.M.Past, Present And Future Of The Smart City In India: An Institutional PerspectiveCities, 146 (2024)
38646 View0.892Prasad, D; Alizadeh, T; Dowling, RMultiscalar Smart City Governance In IndiaGEOFORUM, 121 (2021)
50030 View0.891Bastos D.; Fernández-Caballero A.; Pereira A.; Rocha N.P.Smart City Applications To Promote Citizen Participation In City Management And Governance: A Systematic ReviewInformatics, 9, 4 (2022)
41369 View0.891Lim S.B.; Yigitcanlar T.Participatory Governance Of Smart Cities: Insights From E-Participation Of Putrajaya And Petaling Jaya, MalaysiaSmart Cities, 5, 1 (2022)