Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence From The Multidimensional Analysis
ID_Doc 29429
Authors Janusz M.; Kowalczyk M.
Year 2022
Published Sustainability (Switzerland), 14, 16
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su141610313
Abstract The article presents findings from the multidimensional comparative study focusing on the implementation of the Smart City concept in selected cities of the Visegrad Group (V4). V4 has been established by its member states (Poland, Slovakia, Czech Republic and Hungary) in a joint effort to break from the communist past and develop the common democratic values of the European Community. Aforementioned efforts involved meeting other important goals, such as socio-economic convergence processes including reaching better living conditions for V4 citizens. At present, strategies that aim to improve the wellbeing of citizens are manifested by Smart City concepts and are being implemented in V4 cities. The main research task in this article is to answer the question regarding regional (state) divergence in Smart City implementation in selected cities. The results of the study show that the best Smart City implementation scores are shared by Czech Republic towns. Polish cities (Kielce, Rzeszów, Lublin) located in the eastern regions of the country (which are also eastern border regions of the European Union) have the worst Smart City implementation scores, according to the value of the synthetic measure. © 2022 by the authors.
Author Keywords CEE countries; cluster analysis; Hellwig’s development pattern method; Smart City; smart concept; V4; Visegrad Group


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
29457 View0.925Blazek R.; Durana P.; Jaros J.How The V4 Nations Handle The Idea Of Smart CitiesInformation (Switzerland), 13, 12 (2022)
51712 View0.915Jakubcinova M.; Stefcikova K.; Paril V.; Hruza F.Smart Visegrad-How Modern And Dynamic Are The Local Governments Of The V4 RegionsAdministratie si Management Public, 2024, 43 (2024)
30586 View0.871Šindleryová I.B.; Čajková A.Implementation Of Smart City Solutions From The Perspective Of The Population In SlovakiaAdministratie si Management Public, 2023, 40 (2023)
10700 View0.861Stanković J.J.; Popović Ž.; Marjanović I.Assessing Smartness And Urban Development Of The European Cities:An Integrated Approach Of Entropy And VikorContributions to Management Science (2021)
56921 View0.861Correia D.; Marques J.L.; Teixeira L.The State-Of-The-Art Of Smart Cities In The European UnionSmart Cities, 5, 4 (2022)
56899 View0.855Dragan A.; Creţan R.; Bulzan R.D.The Spatial Development Of Peripheralisation: The Case Of Smart City Projects In RomaniaArea, 56, 1 (2024)
57185 View0.853Parubochaya E.F.; Piskunov N.V.; Drinova E.M.The “Smart Cities” Concept In The European Union And The Russian Federation: From Project To Practical ImplementationLecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 155 (2021)
49382 View0.853Michaela Z.; Horak T.Smart Cities And Quality Of Life Perception In The Czech Republic2020 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, SCSP 2020 (2020)
10633 View0.852Correia D.; Marques J.L.; Teixeira L.Assessing And Ranking Eu Cities Based On The Development Phase Of The Smart City ConceptSustainability (Switzerland), 15, 18 (2023)
55512 View0.852Jonek-Kowalska, IThe Exclusiveness Of Smart Cities-Myth Or Reality? Comparative Analysis Of Selected Economic And Demographic Conditions Of Polish CitiesSMART CITIES, 6, 5 (2023)