Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title An Integrated Performance Evaluation Approach For The Indian Smart Cities
ID_Doc 8462
Authors Chakraborty, S; Ghosh, S; Agarwal, S; Chakraborty, S
Year 2021
Published OPSEARCH, 58, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12597-021-00527-3
Abstract A smart city can be defined as an urban region with modern technological features, enhanced mobility and upgraded public utility services. Query In this paper, the application of an integrated approach is proposed to assess the relative performance of 98 Indian smart cities with respect to 11 evaluation criteria. Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method is first adopted to divide all the considered criteria into appropriate cause and effect groups along with the determination of their weights. It also identifies the most influential criterion which dominates the others, and the most trivial criterion which is being dominated by the others. The application of the generalized k-means clustering algorithm reduces the initial dataset containing 98 smart cities into a manageable set with only 23 efficient cities. Finally, multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method is adopted to rank the shortlisted cities from the best to the worst. In the derived ranking list, Aizawl occupies the top position, followed by Mangalore. Warangal and Bilaspur are the two worst performing cities. The proposed approach can also recognize the relative strengths and weaknesses of each of the cities so that appropriate remedial measures can be augmented to strengthen the lagging infrastructures of the underperforming Indian smart cities.
Author Keywords Indian smart city; Performance; Evaluation; DEMATEL; MABAC


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
44565 View0.88Hajek P.; Youssef A.; Hajkova V.Recent Developments In Smart City Assessment: A Bibliometric And Content Analysis-Based Literature ReviewCities, 126 (2022)
60600 View0.879De Genaro Chiroli D.M.; Solek E.A.B.; Oliveira R.S.; Barboza B.M.L.; De Campos R.P.; Kovaleski J.L.; Tebecherani S.M.; Trojan F.Using Multi-Criteria Analysis For Smart City AssessmentCidades, 44 (2022)
14527 View0.874Kenger O.N.; Kenger Z.D.; Ozceylan E.; Mrugalska B.Clustering Of Cities Based On Their Smart Performances: A Comparative Approach Of Fuzzy C-Means, K-Means, And K-MedoidsIEEE Access, 11 (2023)
10880 View0.873Saketh V.S.R.; Puppala H.Assessment Of Smart City Indicators From Ict Framework In An Indian Context: A Fuzzy Dematel ApproachLecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 277 (2023)
24858 View0.87Guan J.; Bu N.; Wang B.; Yu T.Evaluation Of Smart City Performance: A Systematic Literature ReviewICCREM 2021: Challenges of the Construction Industry under the Pandemic - Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2021 (2021)
2180 View0.87Eliguzel I.M.; Eliguzel N.A Hybrid Lda And Fuzzy Critic-Mabac Model For Smart City RankingIEEE Access, 13 (2025)
28087 View0.868Alkhereibi A.H.; Abulibdeh R.; Abulibdeh A.Global Smart Cities Classification Using A Machine Learning Approach To Evaluating Livability, Technology, And Sustainability Performance Across Key Urban IndicesJournal of Cleaner Production, 503 (2025)
8638 View0.866Manoharan G.; Durai S.; Rajesh G.A.; Razak A.; Rao C.B.S.; Ashtikar S.P.An Investigation Into The Effectiveness Of Smart City Projects By Identifying The Framework For Measuring PerformanceArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Smart City Planning (2023)
12977 View0.864Praharaj, S; Han, HBuilding A Typology Of The 100 Smart Cities In IndiaSMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 8, 5 (2019)
36588 View0.864Sotirelis P.; Nakopoulos P.; Valvi T.; Grigoroudis E.; Carayannis E.Measuring Smart City Performance: A Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis ApproachJournal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 4 (2022)