Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title An Emergent Taxonomy Of Boundary Spanning In The Smart City Context – The Case Of Smart Dublin
ID_Doc 7941
Authors Karimikia H.; Bradshaw R.; Singh H.; Ojo A.; Donnellan B.; Guerin M.
Year 2022
Published Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122100
Abstract Smart cities emphasize the use of advanced technology to deliver better services to and improve the well-being of their residents. Since the administrative authorities that manage cities often lack the knowledge and skills needed to transform their operations in this way, smart city initiatives usually involve a complex set of actors, from local urban authorities and their technical departments to small and large IT firms, academics, and civic organizations, as well as individual citizens. Mediating organizations are often set up to coordinate and manage such interactions. However, little is known about the roles and activities of such bodies. Using data from the Dublin smart city projects, this study draws on the concept of boundary spanning to develop a taxonomy of the work of such intermediaries. Divided into technical, political, social, and cultural domains, the study demonstrates the critical role of the work done by such bodies in enhancing collaboration among and the participation of a diverse group of citizens, IT and digital strategy departments of local authorities, universities and local/international IT companies (e.g., Google, Facebook or Airbnb), leading to a bottom-up governance style of leading smart city initiatives and projects. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
Author Keywords Boundary spanning; Governance; Smart city; Taxonomy


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
29352 View0.894Esposito G.; Bertello A.; Mora L.; Tucek D.How Do Boundary Objects Influence People-Centered Smart Cities? A Systematic Literature ReviewReview of Managerial Science (2025)
50461 View0.886Ricciardi F.; Za S.Smart City Research As An Interdisciplinary Crossroads: A Challenge For Management And Organization StudiesLecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 5 (2015)
36497 View0.877Zuzul, TWMatter Battles: Cognitive Representations, Boundary Objects, And The Failure Of Collaboration In Two Smart CitiesACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 62, 3 (2019)
3921 View0.876Marchesani F.; Ceci F.A Quadruple Helix View On Smart City: Exploring The Effect Of Internal And External Open Innovation On Public Services DigitalizationTechnovation, 139 (2025)
55113 View0.876Enlund D.; Harrison K.The Complexities Of Smartification: Exploring Horizontal Tensions In Smart City GovernanceUrban Studies (2024)
33183 View0.875Burns R.; Welker P.Interstitiality In The Smart City: More Than Top-Down And Bottom-Up SmartnessUrban Studies, 60, 2 (2023)
57490 View0.874Nilssen, MTo The Smart City And Beyond? Developing A Typology Of Smart Urban InnovationTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 142 (2019)
20333 View0.874Nochta T.; Lemanski C.; Wan L.; Parlikad A.K.; Schooling J.M.; Jin Y.Digitalisation For Smarter Cities: Moving From A Static To A Dynamic ViewProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 171, 4 (2019)
26038 View0.873Clement J.; Manjon M.; Crutzen N.Factors For Collaboration Amongst Smart City Stakeholders: A Local Government PerspectiveGovernment Information Quarterly, 39, 4 (2022)
21717 View0.871Ooms, W; Caniëls, MCJ; Roijakkers, N; Cobben, DEcosystems For Smart Cities: Tracing The Evolution Of Governance Structures In A Dutch Smart City InitiativeINTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 16, 4 (2020)