Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title	Matter Battles: Cognitive Representations, Boundary Objects, And The Failure Of Collaboration In Two Smart Cities
ID_Doc	36497
Authors	Zuzul, TW
Year	2019
Published	ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 62, 3
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0625
Abstract	In this paper, I present a longitudinal study of two smart city projects that brought together experts from diverse knowledge domains. Both projects structured collaboration around the development of boundary objects that could integrate actors' expertise. In both projects, however, the objects sparked conflicts that exacerbated rather than attenuated differences. I develop a process model exploring how and why the development of boundary objects can manifest as divisive conflict that derails collaboration. In both projects, extreme novelty gave rise to concept ambiguity, a lack of shared ideas about what smart cities were, and process ambiguity, a lack of shared ideas about how smart cities should be developed. Ambiguity led actors from diverse domains to form divergent cognitive representations about smart cities. As they developed boundary objects, actors made decisions that violated some cognitive representations, while reifying others into material outcomes. Their efforts to develop the objects manifest as matter battles: high-stakes conflicts about material outcomes that, over time, set the stage for collaboration failure. In advancing these ideas, I provide an alternative perspective to the literature on collaboration across boundaries, which has primarily treated boundary objects as tools of integration rather than weapons of division.
Author Keywords

Similar Articles

Id	Similarity	Authors	Title	Published
29352	0.912	Esposito G.; Bertello A.; Mora L.; Tucek D.	How Do Boundary Objects Influence People-Centered Smart Cities? A Systematic Literature Review	Review of Managerial Science (2025)
55102	0.893	Thabit S.; Mora L.	The Collaboration Dilemma In Smart City Projects: Time To Ask The Right Questions	Organization, 31, 7 (2024)
1596	0.879	Dolmans S.A.M.; van Galen W.P.L.; Walrave B.; den Ouden E.; Valkenburg R.; Romme A.G.L.	A Dynamic Perspective On Collaborative Innovation For Smart City Development: The Role Of Uncertainty, Governance, And Institutional Logics	Organization Studies, 44, 10 (2023)
7941	0.877	Karimikia H.; Bradshaw R.; Singh H.; Ojo A.; Donnellan B.; Guerin M.	An Emergent Taxonomy Of Boundary Spanning In The Smart City Context – The Case Of Smart Dublin	Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185 (2022)
3732	0.873	Lindland K.M.F.	A Pragmatist Approach To The Smart City Concept And Practice	A Nordic Smart Sustainable City: Lessons from Theory and Practice (2025)
49498	0.87	Pierce, P; Ricciardi, F; Zardini, A	Smart Cities As Organizational Fields: A Framework For Mapping Sustainability-Enabling Configurations	SUSTAINABILITY, 9, 9 (2017)
41017	0.869	Mora L.	Organizing For Smart City Development: Research At The Crossroads. Introduction To The Special Issue	Organization Studies, 44, 10 (2023)
26517	0.868	Ruess A.K.; Müller R.	Finding Solutions To Problems That Never Existed: A Case Study Of Co-Creation In The Municipality Of The Future	Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11, 1 (2024)
55197	0.864	Quek H.Y.; Sielker F.; Akroyd J.; Bhave A.N.; Von Richthofen A.; Herthogs P.; Yamu C.V.D.L.; Wan L.; Nochta T.; Burgess G.; Lim M.Q.; Mosbach S.; Kraft M.	The Conundrum In Smart City Governance: Interoperability And Compatibility In An Ever-Growing Ecosystem Of Digital Twins	Data and Policy, 5 (2023)
14005	0.863	Marcus, L; Koch, D	Cities As Implements Or Facilities - The Need For A Spatial Morphology In Smart City Systems	ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE, 44, 2 (2017)