Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title What Are The Differences Between Sustainable And Smart Cities?
ID_Doc 61646
Authors Ahvenniemi, H; Huovila, A; Pinto-Seppä, I; Airaksinen, M
Year 2017
Published CITIES, 60
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
Abstract City assessment tools can be used as support for decision making in urban development as they provide assessment methodologies for cities to show the progress towards defined targets. In the 21st century, there has been a shift from sustainability assessment to smart city goals. We analyze 16 sets of city assessment frameworks (eight smart city and eight urban sustainability assessment frameworks) comprising 958 indicators altogether by dividing the indicators under three impact categories and 12 sectors. The following main observations derive from the analyses: as expected, there is a much stronger focus on modern technologies and "smartness" in the smart city frameworks compared to urban sustainability frameworks. Another observation is that as urban sustainability frameworks contain a large number of indicators measuring environmental sustainability, smart city frameworks lack environmental indicators while highlighting social and economic aspects. A general goal of smart cities is to improve sustainability with help of technologies. Thus, we recommend the use of a more accurate term "smart sustainable cities" instead of smart cities. However, the current large gap between smart city and sustainable city frameworks suggest that there is a need for developing smart city frameworks further or re-defining the smart city concept. We recommend that the assessment of smart city performance should not only use output indicators that measure the efficiency of deployment of smart solutions but also impact indicators that measure the contribution towards the ultimate goals such as environmental, economic or social sustainability. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords Smart city; Sustainable city; Indicator; Assessment framework; Performance measurement


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
60204 View0.924Sharifi A.; Kawakubo S.; Milovidova A.Urban Sustainability Assessment Tools: Toward Integrating Smart City IndicatorsUrban Systems Design: Creating Sustainable Smart Cities in the Internet of Things Era (2020)
39937 View0.916Sharifi A.; Allam Z.On The Taxonomy Of Smart City Indicators And Their Alignment With Sustainability And ResilienceEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49, 5 (2022)
25674 View0.909Almeida F.; Guimarães C.M.; Amorim V.Exploring The Differences And Similarities Between Smart Cities And Sustainable Cities Through An Integrative ReviewSustainability (Switzerland), 16, 20 (2024)
1155 View0.908Shi F.; Shi W.A Critical Review Of Smart City Frameworks: New Criteria To Consider When Building Smart City FrameworkISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, 9 (2023)
31762 View0.907Veloso Á.; Fonseca F.; Ramos R.Insights From Smart City Initiatives For Urban Sustainability And Contemporary UrbanismSmart Cities, 7, 6 (2024)
31008 View0.905Stratigea A.; Leka A.; Panagiotopoulou M.In Search Of Indicators For Assessing Smart And Sustainable Cities And Communities' PerformanceE-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2-3 (2018)
5447 View0.904Karal F.S.; Soyer A.A Systematic Literature Review: Setting A Basis For Smart And Sustainable City Performance MeasurementSustainable Development, 32, 1 (2024)
10337 View0.904Cai M.; Kassens-Noor E.; Zhao Z.; Colbry D.Are Smart Cities More Sustainable? An Exploratory Study Of 103 U.S. CitiesJournal of Cleaner Production, 416 (2023)
55519 View0.902Alidadi M.; Sharifi A.The Extent Of Inclusion Of Smart City Indicators In Existing Urban Sustainability Assessment ToolsUrban Climate Adaptation and Mitigation (2022)
57193 View0.9Bashirpour Bonab A.; Bellini F.; Rudko I.Theoretical And Analytical Assessment Of Smart Green CitiesJournal of Cleaner Production, 410 (2023)