Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Understanding Trust In The Smart City Through Focus Groups In Hong Kong
ID_Doc 59559
Authors Lai C.M.T.; Cole A.; Stivas D.
Year 2025
Published Urban Science, 9, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9040123
Abstract This paper examines the role of focus groups in mixed-methods research, focusing on trust dynamics within the smart city. It takes the Asian metropolis of Hong Kong as its empirical case. It successfully validates focus groups as a research method across three dimensions. Firstly, focus groups facilitate the comparison of in-depth discussions across various demographic groups; secondly, focus groups enable collective deliberation to uncover hidden relationships; and, thirdly, when correctly employed, focus groups can bridge qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (surveys) research to enhance triangulation. In this study, the findings of focus groups substantiate the data trust paradox identified in previous surveys and interviews: high public support for technology in a low-trust environment, with explicit privacy concerns related to data management. The focus group results reinforce distinct insights in relation to birth origins and political identities, reconfirming differential trust among demographic groups. This paper demonstrates tailored focus groups as an effective approach to unraveling the trust dynamics in smart city strategies. © 2025 by the authors.
Author Keywords focus groups; Hong Kong; mixed-methods approach; smart city; trust dynamics


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
59057 View0.892Cole A.; Tran É.Trust And The Smart City: The Hong Kong ParadoxChina Perspectives, 2022, 3 (2022)
35017 View0.883Lai C.M.T.; Cole A.Levels Of Public Trust As The Driver Of Citizens' Perceptions Of Smart Cities: The Case Of Hong KongProcedia Computer Science, 207 (2022)
27334 View0.88Nathansohn R.; Lahat L.From Urban Vitality To Urban Vitalisation: Trust, Distrust, And Citizenship Regimes In A Smart City InitiativeCities, 131 (2022)
43725 View0.873Hartley K.; Aldag A.Public Trust And Support For Government Technology: Survey Insights About Singapore'S Smart City PoliciesCities, 154 (2024)
43724 View0.869Hartley, KPublic Trust And Political Legitimacy In The Smart City: A Reckoning For TechnocracySCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 46, 6 (2021)
52055 View0.867Rasoulzadeh Aghdam S.; Bababei Morad B.; Ghasemzadeh B.; Irani M.; Huovila A.Social Smart City Research: Interconnections Between Participatory Governance, Data Privacy, Artificial Intelligence And Ethical Sustainable DevelopmentFrontiers in Sustainable Cities, 6 (2024)
48019 View0.866McKenna H.P.Seeing Smart Cities Through A Multi-Dimensional Lens: Perspectives, Relationships, And Patterns For SuccessSeeing Smart Cities Through a Multi-Dimensional Lens: Perspectives, Relationships, and Patterns for Success (2021)
59478 View0.86Emami-Naeini P.; Breda J.; Dai W.; Kohno T.; Laine K.; Patel S.; Roesner F.Understanding People'S Concerns And Attitudes Toward Smart CitiesConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2023)
16673 View0.859Waclawek T.; Fiedler A.; Schütz M.; Schütz A.Crowd-Counting Technology Within The Smart City Context: Understanding, Trust, And AcceptanceFrontiers in Psychology, 15 (2024)
49559 View0.859Bittencourt J.C.N.; Costa D.G.; Portugal P.; Vasques F.Smart Cities For Equitable Societies: Promoting Digital Equality, Trust, And Ethical Governance2024 IEEE Smart Cities Futures Summit, SCFC 2024 (2024)