Smart City Gnosys
Smart city article details
| Title | Uncertainty Avoidance And Individualism Collectivism On Acceptance Of Smart City Mobile Applications |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 59406 |
| Authors | Negara J.G.P.; Setyohadi D.B.; Pranowo |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | ICICoS 2020 - Proceeding: 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICICoS51170.2020.9298974 |
| Abstract | The issue of e-government development and the concept of the smart city as an answer the government service challenges have emerged before. Cellular communication technology, communication networks, are developing rapidly and provide opportunities to play a role in the development of government areas. The emergence of smart city mobile applications can play a role in solving the challenges of shortening time, cutting distances, and disclosure of information. A technology acceptance survey has been carried out combined with cultural moderators. The survey data in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, is processed using Smart PLS 3.2 with Sequential Equation Modeling. It is unique to be discussed because the p-values of Uncertainty Avoidance (UC) 0,013 which means this is most significant, but Individual/Collectivism (IC) is more than 0.05, which means IC is not significant, it does not moderate the behavior of users of this technology. In this paper, we describe the findings of IC research that do not moderate behavioral intentions. One of our findings is that users use this application due to government service needs, so aspects of individualism and collectivism have no significant effect. We review other findings in the IC moderator in-depth about why they do not affect. © 2020 IEEE. |
| Author Keywords | acceptance; collectivism; individualism; mobile applications; smart city |
Similar Articles
| Id | Similarity | Authors | Title | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
6919  | 0.873 | Bokhari S.A.A.; Myeong S. | Ai Applications In Smart City Employing Technology Adoption Model: Hofstede'S Cultural Perspective | 2023 2nd International Conference for Innovation in Technology, INOCON 2023 (2023) |
| 50533 | 0.867 | Dirsehan T.; van Zoonen L. | Smart City Technologies From The Perspective Of Technology Acceptance | IET Smart Cities, 4, 3 (2022) |
| 59460 | 0.856 | Darmawan A.K.; Siahaan D.O.; Susanto T.D.; Hoiriyah; Umam B.A.; Bakir B. | Understanding Indonesian Citizen'S Continuance Intention To Use Mobile-Based Smart City: A Perspective Of Modified Expectation Confirmation Model (M-Ecm) | 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, ICITACEE 2020 - Proceedings (2020) |
| 30627 | 0.855 | Sepasgozar, SME; Hawken, S; Sargolzaei, S; Foroozanfa, M | Implementing Citizen Centric Technology In Developing Smart Cities: A Model For Predicting The Acceptance Of Urban Technologies | TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 142 (2019) |
| 33392 | 0.854 | Nusir M.; Alshirah M.; Alghsoon R. | Investigating Smart City Adoption From The Citizen’S Insights: Empirical Evidence From The Jordan Context | PeerJ Computer Science, 9 (2023) |
| 8098 | 0.853 | Hakeem M.J.; Sulphey M.M. | An Evaluation Of Factors Affecting The Acceptance Of Smart City Ict Services In India | Public Administration and Policy (2025) |
| 27263 | 0.851 | Gui A.; Aprilia Y.; Syamsuar D.; Mohamed Zainal S.R.; Halim E.; Kartawiguna D. | From Skepticism To Acceptance: Trust And Behavior In Smart City Adoption | 5th Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress: Innovative Electricals and Electronics, RI2C 2024 - Proceedings (2024) |