Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Public Good And Public Attitudes Toward Data Sharing Through Iot
ID_Doc 56313
Authors Mossberger K.; Cho S.; Cheong P.H.; Kuznetsova D.
Year 2023
Published Policy and Internet, 15, 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/poi3.343
Abstract The Internet of Things (IoT) has potential to deliver important benefits for IoT users, society and public good. How do citizens feel about sharing data from personal devices compared with “smart city” data collection in public spaces, with government and nongovernmental organizations, and across different situations? What predicts willingness to share their data with government? Through a nationally representative survey of over 2000 US respondents as well as interviews, we explore the willingness of citizens to share their data in various circumstances, using the contextual integrity framework, the literature on the “publicness” of organizations, and public value creation. Across different contexts, from half to 2/3 of survey respondents were willing to share data from their own IoT devices for public benefits, and 80%−93% supported the use of sensors in public places for a variety of collective purposes. Trust in government was significantly related to data sharing and support for smart city data collection. Yet government in the United States is less trusted with this data than other organizations with public purposes, such as nonprofits. Cultivating trust through transparent and responsible data stewardship will be important for future use of IoT data for public good. © 2023 Policy Studies Organization.
Author Keywords contextual integrity framework; data privacy; internet of things; public good; publicness; smart cities


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
61814 View0.901Jacobs N.; Edwards P.; Markovic M.; Cottrill C.D.; Salt K.Who Trusts In The Smart City? Transparency, Governance, And The Internet Of ThingsData and Policy, 2, 7 (2020)
43725 View0.874Hartley K.; Aldag A.Public Trust And Support For Government Technology: Survey Insights About Singapore'S Smart City PoliciesCities, 154 (2024)
59478 View0.874Emami-Naeini P.; Breda J.; Dai W.; Kohno T.; Laine K.; Patel S.; Roesner F.Understanding People'S Concerns And Attitudes Toward Smart CitiesConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2023)
19394 View0.87Özçağdavul M.; Sayan H.H.Developing A New Technology Acceptance Model For Smart City Applications In Compliance With GdprIntelligent Buildings International (2025)
56877 View0.869Shimizu, Y; Osaki, S; Hashimoto, T; Karasawa, KThe Social Acceptance Of Collecting And Utilizing Personal Information In Smart CitiesSUSTAINABILITY, 13, 16 (2021)
27241 View0.868Fei S.From Public Value To Adoption: Understanding The Mediators Of Ict Use In Smart CitiesVoluntas (2025)
59069 View0.867Wiencierz C.; Lünich M.Trust In Open Data Applications Through TransparencyNew Media and Society, 24, 8 (2022)
49559 View0.862Bittencourt J.C.N.; Costa D.G.; Portugal P.; Vasques F.Smart Cities For Equitable Societies: Promoting Digital Equality, Trust, And Ethical Governance2024 IEEE Smart Cities Futures Summit, SCFC 2024 (2024)
43688 View0.858Hartley K.Public Perceptions About Smart Cities: Governance And Quality-Of-Life In Hong KongSocial Indicators Research, 166, 3 (2023)
6390 View0.857Estivill-Castro V.; Charnejovsky M.P.; Maccani G.Addressing Challenges And Opportunities In Data Sharing For The Common Good: The Case Of Europe'S First Data Altruism Organisation2024 IEEE Smart Cities Futures Summit, SCFC 2024 (2024)