Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Insurgent Smart City: How A Social Movement Created An Alternative Imaginary Of The Smart City
ID_Doc 55909
Authors Stokols A.
Year 2025
Published Journal of Urban Affairs, 47, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2216887
Abstract Urban scholars have critiqued smart cities for their association with neoliberal governance, narrow focus on quantifiable aspects of urban systems, and failure to incorporate citizens' needs or aspirations. The "smart city" remains a contested concept and as such is subject to reappropriation. Here, I analyze the case of an urban social movement, the 2019-2020 Hong Kong Anti-ELAB protests, as an alternative, "insurgent smart city." Following from an earlier network analysis of Telegram channels used during the protests, I show how the communications system underpinning much of the protest action simultaneously enabled coordination while also remaining open to grassroots decision-making and innovations of new protest formats as the movement responded to countertactics of the state and police. Telegram channels linked neighborhood-based organizing to the citywide movement. These actions not only emulated but also inverted top-down visions of a total urban information system underpinning many smart city projects. Framing the Hong Kong Anti-ELAB protests as an insurgent smart city offers an alternative sociotechnical imaginary of what smart cities could be, and raises possibilities for an "insurgent digital citizenship" as an alternative to both state and platform-mediated forms of digital citizenship.
Author Keywords Asia; Hong Kong; information technology; smart city; social movement; Urban politics


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
39037 View0.916Ting T.-Y.Networked Disobedience To Smart City Development: The Case Of Hong KongIET Smart Cities, 7, 1 (2025)
56219 View0.915Ting T.-Y.The Pitfalls Of Smart Urban Infrastructure During A Period Of Unrest: Networked Dissent Against Smart Lampposts In Hong KongJournal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8, 9 (2024)
7283 View0.883Vadiati N.Alternatives To Smart Cities: A Call For Consideration Of Grassroots Digital UrbanismDigital Geography and Society, 3 (2022)
69 View0.878Marinelli, A; Parisi, S(Smart) City And The (Open) Data. A Critical Approach To A Platform-Driven Urban CitizenshipPARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 13, 2 (2020)
14092 View0.873Cardullo P.Citizens In The 'Smart City': Participation, Co-Production, GovernanceCitizens in the 'Smart City': Participation, Co-Production, Governance (2020)
51683 View0.872Cardullo, P; Kitchin, RSmart Urbanism And Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic Of 'Citizen-Focused' Smart Cities In EuropeENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 37, 5 (2019)
31011 View0.872Zandbergen, D; Uitermark, JIn Search Of The Smart Citizen: Republican And Cybernetic Citizenship In The Smart CityURBAN STUDIES, 57, 8 (2020)
31093 View0.871Kim K.Inclusion, Exclusion, And Participation In Digital Polis: Double-Edged Development Of Poor Urban Communities In Alternative Smart City-MakingAdvances in 21st Century Human Settlements (2023)
33183 View0.871Burns R.; Welker P.Interstitiality In The Smart City: More Than Top-Down And Bottom-Up SmartnessUrban Studies, 60, 2 (2023)
30183 View0.869Dürr M.Illiberal Smart Urbanism? Lessons From The Politics Of State-Led Smart Securitisation In Miskolc, HungaryUrban Studies, 60, 3 (2023)