Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Illiberal Smart Urbanism? Lessons From The Politics Of State-Led Smart Securitisation In Miskolc, Hungary
ID_Doc 30183
Authors Dürr M.
Year 2023
Published Urban Studies, 60, 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00420980221100462
Abstract This article makes the case for the ‘illiberal smart city’ in response to a growing body of literature on the post-politicisation of smart urbanism. Drawing on the centralised rollout of an intelligent CCTV network in Miskolc, Hungary, under a regime that calls itself ‘illiberal’, the article proposes an alternative perspective on the politics of smart urbanism in continuation of dialogues on the ‘actually existing smart city’. To this end, two key claims will be put forward. First, in contrast to mainstream post-political understandings of smart urbanism, Miskolc’s smart surveillance project is wrapped up in an explicitly right-wing populist, and in certain respects racialised social ordering campaign. Second, not only is the CCTV network a key manifestation of a populist agenda, but it also reproduces the illiberal smart city through engineering a new consensus around securitisation without responding to the root causes of crime and segregation. Rather than engaging in depth with the digital technologies themselves, the article instead focuses on the underpinning politics of smart surveillance in Miskolc to show how, in the project’s implementation, post-political ideas are replaced by the overt campaigning machinery of the illiberal state. © Urban Studies Journal Limited 2022.
Author Keywords Central Eastern Europe; illiberal democracy; right-wing populism; securitisation; smart urbanism


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
11142 View0.886Akbari A.Authoritarian Smart City: A Research AgendaSurveillance and Society, 20, 4 (2022)
56219 View0.874Ting T.-Y.The Pitfalls Of Smart Urban Infrastructure During A Period Of Unrest: Networked Dissent Against Smart Lampposts In Hong KongJournal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8, 9 (2024)
1146 View0.873Adám, SA Critical Geographical Analysis Of The Smart City Concept - Theoretical Background And Possible Research DirectionsTER ES TARSADALOM, 34, 2 (2020)
12949 View0.871Pereira G.; Israel C.; Firmino R.; Kramer H.; Abad J.Building A Digital Wall: The Political Economy Of Smart Surveillance In Curitiba, BrazilGlobalizations (2025)
50668 View0.87Molchanov M.A.; Molchanova V.Smart City—A Global Project Of Late CapitalismTurning Points of World Transformation: New Trends, Challenges and Actors (2022)
55909 View0.869Stokols A.The Insurgent Smart City: How A Social Movement Created An Alternative Imaginary Of The Smart CityJournal of Urban Affairs, 47, 4 (2025)
39037 View0.867Ting T.-Y.Networked Disobedience To Smart City Development: The Case Of Hong KongIET Smart Cities, 7, 1 (2025)
33183 View0.866Burns R.; Welker P.Interstitiality In The Smart City: More Than Top-Down And Bottom-Up SmartnessUrban Studies, 60, 2 (2023)
43350 View0.862Tello, AMProgram And Govern. Technological-Political Disputes In The Era Of Smart CitiesARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 198, 803 (2022)
49430 View0.861Kitchin R.; Lauriault T.P.; McArdle G.Smart Cities And The Politics Of Urban DataSmart Urbanism: Utopian vision or false dawn? (2015)