Smart City Gnosys
Smart city article details
| Title | Smart Cities: Who Cares? |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 49932 |
| Authors | Burns, R; Andrucki, M |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 53, 1 |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20941516 |
| Abstract | The growing critical research agenda on smart cities and open data programs has largely overlooked the body-subjects that enable its (re)production. The "ideal" subject of the smart city is prefigured as tech-savvy, independent, and uber-modern, able to produce digital data and analyze it to hold city government "accountable." In this subject production, however, we argue that smart cities continue to rely on forms of reproductive labor that are invisibilized in current research and public discourse: We focus here on unpaid domestic labor, low-paid caring and reproductive labor, and volunteer work. We introduce the term "digital care worker" to capture a new category of reproductive worker in the smart city-voluntary and low-paid data producers and analyzers such as those who undertake "hackathons," usually expected to do so out of love for their cities and communities. Drawing on geographies of care and Eve Sedgwick's notion of the "closet." we argue that the invisibility of digital caring laborers exists in dialectic relation to the spectacularization of particular body-subjects charged with caring for the smart city. Drawing on a discourse analysis of promotional materials and mission statements of key open data advocacy organizations, we propose the idea of "marginalized coder incubators," who deploy assimilationist rhetoric to spectacularize the voluntary labor of women, people of color, and LGBTQ communities that is ultimately performed for the benefit of elites in the neoliberalizing city. |
| Author Keywords | Smart cities; open data; subjectivity; geographies of care; queer theory |
Similar Articles
| Id | Similarity | Authors | Title | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
36143  | 0.911 | Burns, R; Welker, P | Make Our Communities Better Through Data: The Moral Economy Of Smart City Labor | BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 9, 1 (2022) |
| 31543 | 0.882 | Houston D.; McLean J.; Osborne N. | Infrastructural Frictions: Care, Shadows, And Ruins In Multispecies Smart Cities | Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation (2024) |
| 60 | 0.879 | Mouton, M; Burns, R | (Digital) Neo-Colonialism In The Smart City | REGIONAL STUDIES, 55, 12 (2021) |
| 56421 | 0.879 | de Lange M. | The Right To The Datafied City: Interfacing The Urban Data Commons | The Right to the Smart City (2019) |
| 57023 | 0.877 | Abbruzzese T.; Riley A. | The Toronto Public Library As A Site Of Urban Care, Social Repair, And Maintenance In The Smart City | Care and the City: Encounters with Urban Studies (2021) |
| 31011 | 0.871 | Zandbergen, D; Uitermark, J | In Search Of The Smart Citizen: Republican And Cybernetic Citizenship In The Smart City | URBAN STUDIES, 57, 8 (2020) |
| 69 | 0.869 | Marinelli, A; Parisi, S | (Smart) City And The (Open) Data. A Critical Approach To A Platform-Driven Urban Citizenship | PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 13, 2 (2020) |
| 27303 | 0.869 | Costales E.; Zeyen A. | From Social Interaction To Societal Discourse: An Ordonomic Analysis Of The Smart City | Cities, 161 (2025) |
| 33183 | 0.865 | Burns R.; Welker P. | Interstitiality In The Smart City: More Than Top-Down And Bottom-Up Smartness | Urban Studies, 60, 2 (2023) |
| 66 | 0.862 | Leipert S. | (Re)Producing Smart Urban Spaces: Situating Maintenance Labour And Care In Hamburg'S Fibre Optic Infrastructures | Digital Geography and Society, 9 (2025) |