Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title (Digital) Neo-Colonialism In The Smart City
ID_Doc 60
Authors Mouton, M; Burns, R
Year 2021
Published REGIONAL STUDIES, 55, 12
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1915974
Abstract The critical research agenda on smart cities has become increasingly interested in the political-economic relations between digital technologies and everyday urban life. It is now clear that in the smart city, quotidian activities have become valorized as data, and are produced, extracted and circulated with little, if any, remuneration to those individuals from whom they have been abstracted. Smart-city scholars often call this process 'digital colonialism' to highlight the uneven relations of power that enable processes of dispossession and profit generation. In this article we argue that greater conceptual clarity is needed around digital colonialism. Specifically, what is called 'digital colonialism' often entails processes more characteristic of neo-colonialism. By teasing out the differences between digital colonialism and digital neo-colonialism, different relations and processes are illuminated, allowing us to theorize the smart city with greater nuance. Here, we focus on the epistemological claims, practices of legibility and repercussions that emerge when focusing attention on the latter. We show that digital neo-colonialism also requires different political strategies of resistance than its colonial counterpart, and we grapple with the multiple ways in which digital technology research has formulated resistance strategies. We advocate for a collective, structural shift in how data and digital technologies are deployed and circulated within the smart city. To substantiate these claims, we draw on a long-term, ongoing database ethnography in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Author Keywords smart cities; digital neo-colonialism; digital geographies; digital political economy


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
36143 View0.904Burns, R; Welker, PMake Our Communities Better Through Data: The Moral Economy Of Smart City LaborBIG DATA & SOCIETY, 9, 1 (2022)
33183 View0.903Burns R.; Welker P.Interstitiality In The Smart City: More Than Top-Down And Bottom-Up SmartnessUrban Studies, 60, 2 (2023)
39037 View0.902Ting T.-Y.Networked Disobedience To Smart City Development: The Case Of Hong KongIET Smart Cities, 7, 1 (2025)
31011 View0.902Zandbergen, D; Uitermark, JIn Search Of The Smart Citizen: Republican And Cybernetic Citizenship In The Smart CityURBAN STUDIES, 57, 8 (2020)
56421 View0.898de Lange M.The Right To The Datafied City: Interfacing The Urban Data CommonsThe Right to the Smart City (2019)
20091 View0.89Certoma C.Digital Social Innovation: Spatial Imaginaries And Technological Resistances In Urban GovernanceDigital Social Innovation: Spatial Imaginaries and Technological Resistances in Urban Governance (2021)
38939 View0.889Yeo S.J.I.Negotiating Digital Urban Futures: The Limits And Possibilities Of Future-Making In SingaporeTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49, 2 (2024)
69 View0.888Marinelli, A; Parisi, S(Smart) City And The (Open) Data. A Critical Approach To A Platform-Driven Urban CitizenshipPARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 13, 2 (2020)
36912 View0.888Zaman S.; Hertweck C.Methods For Uncovering Discourses That Shape The Urban Imaginary In Helsinki'S Smart CityFrontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4 (2022)
31543 View0.888Houston D.; McLean J.; Osborne N.Infrastructural Frictions: Care, Shadows, And Ruins In Multispecies Smart CitiesDesigning More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation (2024)