Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Multi-Objective Load-Balancing Strategy For Fog-Driven Patient-Centric Smart Healthcare System In A Smart City
ID_Doc 38306
Authors Goel G.; Chaturvedi A.K.
Year 2024
Published Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 14, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7749
Abstract The spatially concentrated architecture of the cloud environment causes excessive latency and network congestion in traditional smart healthcare systems designed for smart cities. Fog computing underpins IoT-enabled smart city solutions for latency sensitivity by putting computing power closer to the network boundary. However, resource management issues degrade service quality and accelerate energy depletion in real-time smart healthcare systems, as the fog node workload has increased exponentially. This paper offers a fog-driven patient-centric smart healthcare system for an e-healthcare environment to maintain Quality of Service (QoS) during severe traffic load on a fog platform. The multi-objective EQLS (Energyefficient QoS-aware Load balancing Strategy), is proposed to stabilize workload among processing nodes to increase real-time sensitivity of critical tasks within optimal response time and energy usage. Using the iFogSim simulator to present the significance of research work, the proposed technique is compared to existing load-balancing policies (Round Robin (RR) and Fog Node Placement Algorithm (FNPA)) regarding energy usage, response time, and cost. The simulation results reveal that EQLS saves 8.7% and 14.9% more energy and 6.2% and 13.4% greater response time over FNPA and RR, respectively. The results signify that the proposed approach can efficiently support real-time applications of smart cities. © by the authors.
Author Keywords Fog Computing; iFogSim; Load Balancing; Smart Cities; Wearable Sensors


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
4114 View0.892Mahdi R.M.; Hassan H.J.; Abdulsaheb G.M.A Review Load Balancing Algorithms In Fog ComputingBIO Web of Conferences, 97 (2024)
23260 View0.892Apat H.K.; Bhaisare K.; Sahoo B.; Maiti P.Energy Efficient Resource Management In Fog Computing Supported Medical Cyber-Physical System2020 International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications, ICCSEA 2020 (2020)
1722 View0.88Singh P.; Kaur R.; Rashid J.; Juneja S.; Dhiman G.; Kim J.; Ouaissa M.A Fog-Cluster Based Load-Balancing TechniqueSustainability (Switzerland), 14, 13 (2022)
29413 View0.877Ksentini A.; Jebalia M.; Tabbane S.How Much Can Fog Computing Enhance Performances Of Heterogeneous Delay-Sensitive Services In Smart Cities?2020 8th International Conference on Communications and Networking, ComNet2020 - Proceedings (2020)
19439 View0.87Borujeni A.M.; Fathy M.; Mozayani N.Developing And Evaluating A Real Time And Energy Efficient Architecture For An Internet Of Health ThingsProceeding of 4th International Conference on Smart Cities, Internet of Things and Applications, SCIoT 2020 (2020)
26784 View0.869Gupta D.; Bansal A.; Wadhwa S.; Garg K.D.Fog-Based Smart Healthcare Architecture In Iot EnvironmentLecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 1040 LNEE (2023)
3430 View0.866Alatoun K.; Matrouk K.; Mohammed M.A.; Nedoma J.; Martinek R.; Zmij P.A Novel Low-Latency And Energy-Efficient Task Scheduling Framework For Internet Of Medical Things In An Edge Fog Cloud SystemSensors, 22, 14 (2022)
4182 View0.864Kumar S.; Singh P.; Singh A.A Review Of Optimized Computational Strategies For Iot: Cloud, Fog, And Edge Computing ApproachesProceedings of 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking, ICPCSN 2025 (2025)
58085 View0.862Nikam R.R.; Motwani D.Towards Decentralized Fog Computing: A Comprehensive Review Of Models, Architectures, And ServicesLecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 818 (2024)
3929 View0.861Apat H.K.; Sahoo B.; Mohanty S.A Quality Of Service(Qos) Aware Fog Computing Model For Intelligent (Iot) ApplicationsProceedings - 2021 19th OITS International Conference on Information Technology, OCIT 2021 (2021)