Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title A Methodology For Participatory Planning Of Smart City Interventions
ID_Doc 2609
Authors Alexopoulos C.; Euripidis L.; Charalabidis Y.
Year 2021
Published Public Administration and Information Technology, 37
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61033-3_8
Abstract The development of smart cities is a highly difficult undertaking, which requires participation and cooperation of several stakeholders, both in its planning, due to the multiplicity of possible smart city interventions available as options, and also in its implementation, due to its high complexity. Especially for planning (selecting and prioritizing) specific smart city actions to be implemented it is necessary to combine knowledge: (1) on one hand from the university and the industry, concerning the possible smart city interventions, the capabilities they can offer in general, as well their difficulties and challenges; (2) and on the other hand from the municipalities and the citizens, concerning the ‘real-life’ benefits and value that these possible interventions can actually provide, and their potential for addressing specific challenges, problems and needs of modern cities. However, there is a lack of sound methodologies for this required participatory planning of smart city interventions. This chapter contributes to filling this gap, by presenting a methodology for this purpose. It is based on a detailed taxonomy of possible smart city actions, which we have developed through a review of relevant literature, representing knowledge that has been developed in this area by the university and the industry, who can be viewed as the smart city actions’ supply side. This taxonomy is used for collecting assessment data from municipalities as well as citizens concerning these possible smart city actions, which incorporate relevant knowledge and preferences of municipalities and citizens, who can be viewed as the smart city actions’ demand side). Our methodology includes three layers of processing the above municipalities’ and citizens’ assessment data, which reveal: (a) the perceptions and priorities of these two important stakeholders concerning smart city actions (layer I–II respectively); and (b) points of convergence as well as points of divergence between them (layer III). These enable a rational participatory planning of smart city interventions. Our methodology has been applied in the context of Greece: assessment data concerning the above possible smart city actions have been collected from 144 Greek municipalities and 500 citizens, and their processing has led to interesting conclusions, which can be quite useful for planning the next steps of smart cities’ development in Greece. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Author Keywords Participatory planning methodology; Smart city actions taxonomy; Smart city interventions; Stakeholder engagement


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
5527 View0.915Alexopoulos, C; Charalabidis, Y; Vogiatzis, N; Kolokotronis, DEA Taxonomy For Analysing Smart Cities Developments In GreecePROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV2018) (2018)
16070 View0.912Charalabidis Y.; Loukis E.; Alexopoulos C.; Vogiatzis N.; Kolokotronis D.Convergence And Divergence Between Municipalities And Citizens About Smart City Actions' PrioritiesACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2020)
9485 View0.907Psathopoulou P.-X.; Alexopoulos A.; Miltiadis C.Analyzing Citizens’ Participation In Shaping Smart Cities: The Case Of The Cities Of The Regional Unit Of Western Sector Of AthensSpringer Proceedings in Business and Economics (2025)
60197 View0.905Esteban-Narro R.; Lo-Iacono-Ferreira V.G.; Torregrosa-López J.I.Urban Stakeholders For Sustainable And Smart Cities: An Innovative Identification And Management MethodologySmart Cities, 8, 2 (2025)
24653 View0.905Senior C.; Temeljotov Salaj A.; Johansen A.; Lohne J.Evaluating The Impact Of Public Participation Processes On Participants In Smart City Development: A Scoping ReviewBuildings, 13, 6 (2023)
5429 View0.905Dai Y.; Hasanefendic S.; Bossink B.A Systematic Literature Review Of The Smart City Transformation Process: The Role And Interaction Of Stakeholders And TechnologySustainable Cities and Society, 101 (2024)
364 View0.901Charalabidis Y.; Alexopoulos C.; Vogiatzis N.; Kolokotronis D.E.A 360-Degree Model For Prioritizing Smart Cities Initiatives, With The Participation Of Municipality Officials, Citizens And ExpertsPublic Administration and Information Technology, 34 (2019)
23752 View0.901Landa Oregi I.; Urra-Uriarte S.; Gonzalez Ochoantesana I.; Rodríguez M.A.; Molina-Costa P.Enhancing Citizen Participation In Citizen-Centered Smart Cities: Insights From Two European Case StudiesUrban Science, 9, 5 (2025)
29355 View0.899Fitsilis P.; Tsoutsa P.; Damasiotis V.; Tsivola R.How Do Citizens Want To Participate In Smart City Programs? Some Answers From GreeceEAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing, Part F633 (2023)
14059 View0.898Psathopoulou P.-X.; Alexopoulos A.; Panagou V.Citizen Participation In The Transition Of Greek Cities To Smart Cities: Does Size Matter?Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 14109 LNCS (2023)