Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Exploring Services In A Smart City Through Socio-Technical Design Principles: Revealing Five Tensions In A Smart Living Context
ID_Doc 25613
Authors Axelsson K.; Melin U.; Granath M.
Year 2024
Published Government Information Quarterly, 41, 1
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101915
Abstract Smart cities have been studied for many years, but smart homes and the citizens' actual living in these smart homes are less researched. We argue that for digital government research, and for governments to be successful in smart city development in practice, it is necessary not only to understand living on a societal level, but also living aspects in the narrow context of homes. Citizens populate the smart city and are the ones who are supposed to use the services provided by the government. In this article we explore and analyze digital and analogue services in smart homes developed in a new city district. We have conducted observational studies in 53 apartments during an urban living expo which we analyze by applying a set of socio-technical design principles. The research question that guides the analysis is: “What tensions between values in digital and analogue services for a smart living can be revealed by a socio-technical perspective?”. We identify five tensions between: 1) being in control and being controlled, 2) intended and undesirable use of personal data, 3) digital and analogue smartness, 4) smart home visions and practices, and 5) environmental and social sustainability. By revealing these tensions, we contribute to an understanding of the complexity of smart living. We also contribute by highlighting the importance of applying a perspective that captures both technology and citizen and user issues (i.e., social aspects) when developing services in the smart home context. © 2024 The Authors
Author Keywords Services; Smart city; Smart home; Smart living; Socio-technical design principles; Tensions


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
20333 View0.897Nochta T.; Lemanski C.; Wan L.; Parlikad A.K.; Schooling J.M.; Jin Y.Digitalisation For Smarter Cities: Moving From A Static To A Dynamic ViewProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 171, 4 (2019)
1967 View0.893Nath N.; Nitanai R.; Manabe R.; Murayama A.A Global-Scale Review Of Smart City Practice And Research Focusing On Residential NeighbourhoodsHabitat International, 142 (2023)
55113 View0.893Enlund D.; Harrison K.The Complexities Of Smartification: Exploring Horizontal Tensions In Smart City GovernanceUrban Studies (2024)
46562 View0.892Goodwin S.C.Revisiting Smartness In The Smart CityThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology (2020)
52110 View0.891Kolodii, NA; Ivanova, VS; Chernova, DASociocentrism Versus Technocentrism In Smart City ResearchVESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 80 (2024)
56760 View0.889Breux, S; Diaz, J; Loiseau, HThe Smart City - Does The Individual Matter?JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 30, 4 (2023)
23087 View0.889Liu C.Encountering Not-So-Smart Technologies In Urban Spaces: Qr Codes, Screens And The Idiocy Of Smart LivingUrban Geography (2025)
28719 View0.889Senatore, G; Sessa, MHard And Soft Smart Cities: An Integrated ApproachSOCIETAMUTAMENTOPOLITICA-RIVISTA ITALIANA DI SOCIOLOGIA, 14, 28 (2023)
50488 View0.889Wirtz B.W.; Becker M.; Schmidt F.W.Smart City Services: An Empirical Analysis Of Citizen PreferencesPublic Organization Review, 22, 4 (2022)
61815 View0.889Lytras, MD; Visvizi, AWho Uses Smart City Services And What To Make Of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities ResearchSUSTAINABILITY, 10, 6 (2018)