Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Encrypted Dataset Collaboration Intelligent Privacy For Smart Cities
ID_Doc 23092
Authors Potoczny-Jones, I; Kenneally, E; Ruffing, J
Year 2019
Published PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ACM/EIGSCC SYMPOSIUM ON SMART CITIES AND COMMUNITIES (SCC'19)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3357492.3358630
Abstract The past year has seen increasing scrutiny of Smart Cities efforts with regard to privacy. Privacy advocates have criticized Smart City data collection on the whole and critiqued specific city efforts that they feel have crossed a line. Cities are struggling with a number of privacy issues, including how to address third parties' collection of Smart City data, how cities consume personally identifying information from third-parties, and how public records laws intersect with privacy concerns. The majority of data that cities collect are subject to disclosure under public record laws, with an attendant obligation to anonymize sensitive private information. However, as the amount and availability of data increases, the ability to cross-reference, correlate, and de-anonymize or re-sensitize datasets also increases. This leads to re-identification attacks that infringe the privacy of individuals in those datasets, and fosters mistrust in city governments and technology vendors. A fundamental challenge is that open data and privacy interact in complex and unpredictable ways. Some cities may choose to allow third parties to collect and manage that data in an effort to encourage innovation in the delivery of city services, while simultaneously wrestling with the legal and policy implications, such as privacy and public records law compliance. Unfortunately, this also may have undesirable privacy outcomes depending on a third-party's use of that data and the city's role in encouraging its collection. In this paper, we will discuss concrete approaches to smart cities data privacy governance including collection and management, and specifically, an innovative pilot project supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science & Technology Directorate aimed at demonstrating how privacy technology can help harmonize data sensitivity risks with intended benefits.
Author Keywords cryptography; data privacy; smart cities; data trust; data fiduciary


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
20033 View0.889De Capitani di Vimercati S.; Foresti S.; Livraga G.; Samarati P.Digital Infrastructure Policies For Data Security And Privacy In Smart CitiesSmart Cities Policies and Financing: Approaches and Solutions (2022)
31226 View0.889Karim R.Individuals’ Privacy And Data Collection In The Context Of Smart Cities: Law And Policy ReviewSmart Cities to Smart Societies: Moving beyond Technology (2025)
5174 View0.886El Majdoubi D.; El Bakkali H.A Survey Of Major Data Privacy Laws, Languages And Approaches In Smart Cities EnvironmentsACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2019)
43075 View0.883Choenni S.; Bargh M.S.; Roepan C.; Meijer R.F.Privacy And Security In Smart Data Collection By CitizensPublic Administration and Information Technology, 11 (2016)
43071 View0.88Fabrègue B.F.G.; Bogoni A.Privacy And Security Concerns In The Smart CitySmart Cities, 6, 1 (2023)
43095 View0.878Peterson M.; Fröding B.Privacy In A Smart CityEtikk i Praksis, 18, 1 (2024)
709 View0.873Zheng, X; Tian, L; Luo, GC; Cai, ZPA Collaborative Mechanism For Private Data Publication In Smart CitiesIEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 7, 9 (2020)
17233 View0.873Subrahmanyam S.Data Governance And Privacy In Smart CitiesCitizen-Centric Artificial Intelligence for Smart Cities (2025)
44527 View0.873Jin Y.; Wang Y.Reassessing Smart City Development And Personal Data Protection: A Regulatory FrameworkInternational Review of Economics and Finance, 99 (2025)
43171 View0.872Sei Y.Privacy-Preserving Data Collection And Analysis For Smart CitiesHuman-Centered Services Computing for Smart Cities: IEICE Monograph (2024)