Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Comparison Of Iot Architectures Using A Smart City Benchmark
ID_Doc 15154
Authors Kumar H.A.; Rakshith J.; Shetty R.; Roy S.; Sitaram D.
Year 2020
Published Procedia Computer Science, 171
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.161
Abstract Several architectures namely Cloud, Fog, Mist, and Edge computing have been proposed for IoT systems, but efforts to practically correlate between them have proved hollow due to difficulties in creating live systems that replicate the frameworks. In this paper, a comparison of these architectures has been made. Simulation models have been developed to form an understanding of the variation in their performance for different values of configuration and workload parameters in a parallel multi-query processing environment. To derive realistic simulations for sensor-data, the Citybench smart city dataset has been used, which is extracted from measurements taken by traffic, temperature, and other sensors, along with a wide range of queries generated in a smart city application. By using seven highly contrasting single and six ratio based mixed Queries, it can be seen that Edge with proximity to query devices and sensors achieves the least latency in four of the single and five of the mixed query simulations with Mist being a close second in the same. However, Fog due to its distributed and high computational capability obtains minimum latency for two single query simulations with Cloud being best for compute-intensive cases. © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Author Keywords Benchmark; CityBench; Cloud; Edge; Fog Computing; IoT; IoT Architecture; Mist; Performance; Query; Simulation Model; Smart City


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
9504 View0.899Pflanzner T.; Kertesz A.Analyzing Iot, Fog And Cloud Environments Using Real Sensor DataFog Computing: Concepts, Frameworks and Technologies (2018)
10476 View0.892Naets B.; Raes W.; Deville R.; Middag C.; Stevens N.; Minnaert B.Artificial Intelligence For Smart Cities: Comparing Latency In Edge And Cloud Computing2022 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit, E-TEMS 2022 - Conference Proceedings (2022)
21732 View0.881Trigka M.; Dritsas E.Edge And Cloud Computing In Smart CitiesFuture Internet, 17, 3 (2025)
54320 View0.88Kumari R.; Kaur K.; Chhabra G.; Bharany S.; Kaushik K.Systematic Mapping Study On Edge And Fog Computing In Smart Cities: A Comprehensive ReviewProceedings of International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering, IC3SE 2024 (2024)
3246 View0.88Sinaeepourfard, A; Garcia, J; Masip-Bruin, X; Marin-Tordera, EA Novel Architecture For Efficient Fog To Cloud Data Management In Smart Cities2017 IEEE 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS (ICDCS 2017) (2017)
26746 View0.879Badidi, E; Mahrez, Z; Sabir, EFog Computing For Smart Cities' Big Data Management And Analytics: A ReviewFUTURE INTERNET, 12, 11 (2020)
26795 View0.879Cheng, B; Solmaz, G; Cirillo, F; Kovacs, E; Terasawa, K; Kitazawa, AFogflow: Easy Programming Of Iot Services Over Cloud And Edges For Smart CitiesIEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 5, 2 (2018)
34104 View0.876Hajam S.S.; Sofi S.A.Iot-Fog Architectures In Smart City Applications: A SurveyChina Communications, 18, 11 (2021)
14444 View0.876Tabrizchi H.; Kuchaki Rafsanjani M.Cloud, Fog, And Serverless Computing Environment For Intelligent Sensor Networks In Smart CitiesDigital Twin and Blockchain for Sensor Networks in Smart Cities (2025)
26756 View0.875Da Silva T.P.; Batista T.; Lopes F.; Neto A.R.; Delicato F.C.; Pires P.F.; Da Rocha A.R.Fog Computing Platforms For Smart City Applications: A SurveyACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 22, 4 (2022)