Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Authenticity And The ‘Authentic City’
ID_Doc 11138
Authors Wittingslow R.M.
Year 2021
Published Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, 36
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_13
Abstract In this paper, I argue that the benefits that smart cities purport to provide cohere poorly with a number of our shared phenomenological intuitions about the relationships(s) between authentic experience and technologised society. While many of these intuitions are, strictly speaking, pseudo-problems, they deserve our attention. These issues will only grow more pressing as our ‘dumb cities’, already so opaque to experience, give way to hyper-technologised ‘smart cities’. However, it is possible to design our way out of these pseudo-problems. Assuming we accept my argument that the distinction between authenticity and the device paradigm is premised upon a certain kind of category error, there is no categorical or definitional reason why it is not possible for urbanised, technologised spaces to feel authentic, whether by virtue of their aesthetic properties, or because they facilitate ‘authentic’ behaviour. Indeed, I argue that ‘inauthenticity’ is an aesthetic rather than an ontological category (much like ‘ugliness’, or ‘boring-ness’), with feelings of inauthenticity serving as evidence of a basic failure of design. Redressing these failures of design requires that we adopt a novel approach to the design and use of technical objects. Consequently, in the concluding analysis of the chapter I outline how the feeling of authenticity can be invoked in the smart city and, consequently, how these failures of design can be avoided. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Author Keywords Authenticity; Borgmann; Postphenomenology; Smart cities; Urbanism


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
44730 View0.892Nursanty E.; Wulandari A.; Rusmiatmoko D.; Destiawan W.Redefining Urban Authenticity In The Digital Era: A Smart City PerspectiveE3S Web of Conferences, 535 (2024)
25613 View0.888Axelsson K.; Melin U.; Granath M.Exploring Services In A Smart City Through Socio-Technical Design Principles: Revealing Five Tensions In A Smart Living ContextGovernment Information Quarterly, 41, 1 (2024)
44533 View0.886Förster N.; Schubert G.; Petzold F.Rebugging The Smart City Design Explorations Of Digital Urban InfrastructureProceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (2022)
14005 View0.884Marcus, L; Koch, DCities As Implements Or Facilities - The Need For A Spatial Morphology In Smart City SystemsENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE, 44, 2 (2017)
23087 View0.883Liu C.Encountering Not-So-Smart Technologies In Urban Spaces: Qr Codes, Screens And The Idiocy Of Smart LivingUrban Geography (2025)
19144 View0.881Aurigi A.Designing Smart Places: Toward A Holistic, Recombinant ApproachShaping Smart for Better Cities: Rethinking and Shaping Relationships between Urban Space and Digital Technologies (2020)
49124 View0.879Freeman G.; Liu S.-Y.; Bardzell J.; Lu X.; Bardzell S.; Cao D.Smart And Fermented Cities: An Approach To Placemaking In Urban InformaticsConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019)
56252 View0.877Geenen A.; Matos Castaño J.; van der Voort M.The Potential Of Smart City Controversies To Foster Civic Engagement, Ethical Reflection And Alternative ImaginariesPhilosophy of Engineering and Technology, 45 (2023)
31543 View0.877Houston D.; McLean J.; Osborne N.Infrastructural Frictions: Care, Shadows, And Ruins In Multispecies Smart CitiesDesigning More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation (2024)
36385 View0.876Brown W.Mapping The Realities Of Smart Urbanism: A Method To Promote Transdisciplinary Smart City ApproachesAdvances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 28 (2022)