Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Work-In-Progress: Worst-Case Response Time Of Intersection Management Protocols
ID_Doc 62042
Authors Reddy R.; Almeida L.; Gaitan M.; Kurunathan H.; Santos P.; Tovar E.
Year 2021
Published Proceedings - Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2021-December
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RTSS52674.2021.00064
Abstract Intersections are critical elements of urban traffic management and are identified as bottlenecks prone to traffic congestion and accidents. Intelligent intersection management plays a significant role in improving traffic efficiency and safety determining, among other metrics, the waiting time that vehicles incur when crossing an intersection. This work presents a preliminary analysis of the worst-case response time of intersection management protocols that handle mixed traffic with autonomous and human-driven vehicles. We deduce theoretical bounds for such time considered as the interval between the injection of a vehicle in the road system and its departure from the intersection, considering different intersection management protocols for mixed traffic, namely the Synchronous Intersection Management Protocol (SIMP) and several configurations of the conventional Round-Robin (RR) policy. Simulation results validate the analytical bounds partially. Ongoing work addresses the queue dynamics and its reliable detection by traffic simulators. © 2021 IEEE.
Author Keywords Intelligent Transportation Systems; Intersection Management; Smart Cities; Worst-Case Response Time


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
62037 View0.9Reddy R.; Almeida L.; Tovar E.Work-In-Progress: Synchronous Intersection Management Protocol For Mixed Traffic FlowsProceedings - Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2019-December (2019)
15929 View0.859Bermad, N; Zemmoudj, S; Omar, MContext-Aware Negotiation, Reputation And Priority Traffic Light Management Protocols For Vanet-Based Smart CitiesTELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 72, 1 (2019)
40615 View0.859Chuprov S.; Viksnin I.; Kim I.; Nedosekin G.Optimization Of Autonomous Vehicles Movement In Urban Intersection Management SystemConference of Open Innovation Association, FRUCT, 2019-April (2019)
41737 View0.859Tabaza H.A.; Saeed I.; Elhadef M.Performance Evaluation Of An Adaptable Invanets-Based Intersection Traffic ControlMulti Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, MCCSIS 2019 - Proceedings of the International Conferences on ICT, Society and Human Beings 2019, Connected Smart Cities 2019 and Web Based Communities and Social Media 2019 (2019)
37621 View0.858Bindzar P.; Marasova D.; Brodny J.; Tutak M.; Ulewicz R.; Sliva A.Modeling The Impact Of Intersection Design Configurations On Traffic Flow During Peak Hour In Smart Cities: A Case Study On Urban Roads In SlovakiaIEEE Access, 12 (2024)
51098 View0.856Khanmohamadi M.; Guerrieri M.Smart Intersections And Connected Autonomous Vehicles For Sustainable Smart Cities: A Brief ReviewSustainability (Switzerland), 17, 7 (2025)
837 View0.856Cho N.; Hainen A.; Tedla E.; Burdette S.A Comparison Of Machine Learning-Based Method Vs. The Highway Capacity Manual Method Of Intersection DelayAdvances in Transportation Studies, 65 (2025)
33182 View0.853Sarran S.; Hassan Y.Intersection Sight Distance In Mixed Automated And Conventional Vehicle Environments With Yield Control On Minor RoadsSmart Cities, 8, 3 (2025)
25323 View0.852Chalaki B.; Beaver L.E.; Malikopoulos A.A.Experimental Validation Of A Real-Time Optimal Controller For Coordination Of Cavs In A Multi-Lane RoundaboutIEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings (2020)
51595 View0.852Alkhatib A.A.A.; Maria K.A.; AlZu'bi S.; Maria E.A.Smart Traffic Scheduling For Crowded Cities Road NetworksEgyptian Informatics Journal, 23, 4 (2022)