Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Understanding The Route Choice Behaviour Of Metro-Bikeshare Users
ID_Doc 59550
Authors Liu Y.; Feng T.; Shi Z.; He M.
Year 2022
Published Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 166
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.006
Abstract Understanding the determinants of the route choice behaviour on a multi-modal transit network of metro and shared bike is important to improve personalized multimodal travel services. This paper attempts to analyse the route choice behaviour of metro-bikeshare users considering passengers’ socio-economic attributes and perceived congestion which is approximated by load status. An abstract integrated metro-bikeshare network (IMBN) is built with virtual nodes by aggregating shared bike stations within the walkable distance and abstract routes by aggregating optional paths for each OD pair. Using the metro- and shared bike smart- card data from Nanjing, China, the route sets of metro-bikeshare users were extracted from the IMBN. A multinomial Logit model (MNL) was then applied to investigate the determinants of route choice behaviour for two types of users, namely “return-enter” and “exit-lease”, respectively. The results show that the models with the load status attributes have a better performance than the models without these attributes. We found the sensitivity of “exit-lease” users to the train crowding is significantly greater than that of the “return-enter” users. “Return-enter” users have a higher perception of out-of-vehicle travel time (OVTT) than that of in-vehicle travel time (IVT), while the “exit-lease” users have the opposite perception. Besides, the change rate of shared bike inventory, departure time and whether he or she is a regular user also have a significant impact on route choice behaviour. The findings can help policymakers and system operators to improve the services and the efficiency of the multimodal transportation system. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
Author Keywords Metro-bikeshare integration; Multinomial logit model; Route choice; Smart card data


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
37504 View0.871Altshuler T.; Altshuler Y.; Katoshevski R.; Shiftan Y.Modeling And Prediction Of Ride Sharing Utilization DynamicsApplied Swarm Intelligence (2024)
13275 View0.869Narayanan S.; Makarov N.; Magkos E.; Salanova Grau J.M.; Aifadopoulou G.; Antoniou C.Can Bike-Sharing Reduce Car Use In Alexandroupolis? An Exploration Through The Comparison Of Discrete Choice And Machine Learning ModelsSmart Cities, 6, 3 (2023)
26042 View0.86Kim J.; Jang K.; Shim J.Factors Influencing Bus-To-Subway Transfer Duration At Subway Stations: Evidence From Large-Scale Smart Card Data In SeoulJournal of Transport Geography, 120 (2024)
9772 View0.857Xiao X.; Xu Y.Application Of A Path-Based Ridesharing User Equilibrium Model Of Drivers Matching Passengers From Multiple Od Pairs To Smart CityProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 13224 (2024)
55392 View0.855Zhong J.; Zhou H.; Lin Y.; Ren F.The Effect Of Ride-Hailing Services On Public Transit Usage In China'S Small- And Medium-Sized Cities: A Synthetic Control Method AnalysisIET Smart Cities, 6, 2 (2024)
1880 View0.851Magsino E.R.; Ching G.R.C.; Espiritu F.M.M.; Go K.D.A Game Theory-Based Pricing Technique For Ridesharing Pairings1st International Conference in Advanced Innovation on Smart City, ICAISC 2023 - Proceedings (2023)
59029 View0.851Ku W.K.; Kou K.P.; Lam S.H.; Wong K.I.Trip-Pair Based Clustering Model For Urban Mobility Of Bus Passengers In MacaoTransportmetrica A: Transport Science, 19, 3 (2023)