Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Towards A Critique Of Cybernetic Urbanism: The Smart City And The Society Of Control
ID_Doc 57815
Authors Krivy, M
Year 2018
Published PLANNING THEORY, 17, 1
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095216645631
Abstract The smart city has become a hegemonic notion of urban governance, transforming and supplanting planning. The first part of this article reviews current critiques of this notion. Scholars present three main arguments against the smart city: that it is incompatible with an informal character of the city, that it subjects the city to corporate power and that it reproduces social and urban inequalities. It is argued that these critiques either misunderstand how power functions in the smart city or fail to address it as a specific modality of entrepreneurial urban governance. The second part advances an alternative critique, contending that the smart city should be understood as an urban embodiment of the society of control (Deleuze). The smart city is embedded in the intellectual framework of second order cybernetics and articulates urban subjectivity in terms of data flows. Planning as a political practice is superseded by an environmental-behavioural control, in which subjectivity is articulated supra-individually (permeating the city with sensing nodes) and infra-individually (making citizens into sensing nodes).
Author Keywords behaviourism; Big Data; control; cybernetics; Deleuze; environmentality; noopolitics; second-order cybernetics; smart city; society of control


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
56980 View0.91Suartika, GAM; Cuthbert, AThe Sustainable Imperative-Smart Cities, Technology And DevelopmentSUSTAINABILITY, 12, 21 (2020)
31011 View0.908Zandbergen, D; Uitermark, JIn Search Of The Smart Citizen: Republican And Cybernetic Citizenship In The Smart CityURBAN STUDIES, 57, 8 (2020)
37767 View0.904Sadowski, J; Maalsen, SModes Of Making Smart Cities: Or, Practices Of Variegated Smart UrbanismTELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 55 (2020)
36385 View0.903Brown W.Mapping The Realities Of Smart Urbanism: A Method To Promote Transdisciplinary Smart City ApproachesAdvances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 28 (2022)
38728 View0.901McGuirk, P; Dowling, R; Chatterjee, PMunicipal Statecraft For The Smart City: Retooling The Smart Entrepreneurial City?ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 53, 7 (2021)
43350 View0.901Tello, AMProgram And Govern. Technological-Political Disputes In The Era Of Smart CitiesARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 198, 803 (2022)
60111 View0.899Cook M.; Karvonen A.Urban Planning And The Knowledge Politics Of The Smart CityUrban Studies, 61, 2 (2024)
27303 View0.899Costales E.; Zeyen A.From Social Interaction To Societal Discourse: An Ordonomic Analysis Of The Smart CityCities, 161 (2025)
54818 View0.899Shelton, T; Zook, M; Wiig, AThe 'Actually Existing Smart City'CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 8, 1 (2015)
51683 View0.899Cardullo, P; Kitchin, RSmart Urbanism And Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic Of 'Citizen-Focused' Smart Cities In EuropeENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 37, 5 (2019)