Smart City Gnosys
Smart city article details
| Title | Three-Way Decision-Based Conditional Probabilities By Opinion Scores And Bayesian Rules In Circular-Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets For Developing Sustainable Smart Living Framework |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 57354 |
| Authors | Alsattar H.A.; Qahtan S.; Mourad N.; Zaidan A.A.; Deveci M.; Jana C.; Ding W. |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Information Sciences, 649 |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119681 |
| Abstract | Sustainable smart living (SSL) is a crucial component in the emergence of smart cities. These cities offer potential solutions to address pressing urban challenges, including traffic congestion, energy consumption and environmental degradation. Recently, many SSL frameworks have been developed based on multiple factors. However, no framework can simultaneously address all these factors. Furthermore, no research has ranked and graded the identified SSL frameworks to select the most sustainable framework. These are considered challenging tasks. To address these challenges, three-way decisions (TWD) and multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) can serve as a valuable solution for city planners and decision-makers. This study introduces TWD-based MCDM as novel conditional probabilities by opinion scores (CPOS) within the context of circular-Pythagorean fuzzy sets (C-PFSs), namely, C-PFSs-CPOS method, to estimate the conditional probability of each alternative. Additionally, Bayesian decision theory within a C-PFS environment is employed to construct the decision thresholds for each alternative. Furthermore, the prioritisation of factors that impact the ranking and grading of SSL frameworks is achieved through the application of the fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) method within a C-PFS environment, namely, C-PFS-FWZIC method. A total of 37 SSL frameworks (alternatives) are evaluated on the basis of 19 assessment factors (criteria) distributed in 4 layers. Results show that six alternatives exhibit a high level of sustainability, as evidenced by their position in the positive region, whereas two alternatives consistently fall within the negative region for all σ values. At σ=0.05, the remaining SSL framework alternatives are positioned within the boundary region. When σ value increases to a range of 0.55–0.59, TWD is transformed into a two-way decision-making. Sensitivity and correlation analyses are conducted to evaluate the stability and robustness of the proposed methods. © 2023 Elsevier Inc. |
| Author Keywords | Circular-Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets; Conditional Probabilities by Opinion Scores method; FWZIC; MCDM; Sustainable smart living; Three-Way Decisions |
Similar Articles
| Id | Similarity | Authors | Title | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
23951  | 0.891 | Lin S.-S.; Zheng X.-J. | Enhancing Smart City Assessment: An Advanced Mcdm Approach For Urban Performance Evaluation | Sustainable Cities and Society, 118 (2025) |
| 36592 | 0.884 | Kutty A.A.; Kucukvar M.; Onat N.C.; Ayvaz B.; Abdella G.M. | Measuring Sustainability, Resilience And Livability Performance Of European Smart Cities: A Novel Fuzzy Expert-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Support Model | Cities, 137 (2023) |
| 10938 | 0.873 | Krishankumar R.; Mishra A.R.; Rani P.; Ecer F.; Ravichandran K.S. | Assessment Of Zero-Carbon Measures For Sustainable Transportation In Smart Cities: A Critic-Marcos Framework Based On Q-Rung Fuzzy Preferences | IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10, 21 (2023) |
| 24349 | 0.872 | Shao Q.-G.; Jiang C.-C.; Lo H.-W.; Liou J.J.H. | Establishing A Sustainable Development Assessment Framework For A Smart City Using A Hybrid Z-Fuzzy-Based Decision-Making Approach | Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 25, 9 (2023) |
| 24883 | 0.87 | Otay İ.; Çevik Onar S.; Öztayşi B.; Kahraman C. | Evaluation Of Sustainable Energy Systems In Smart Cities Using A Multi-Expert Pythagorean Fuzzy Bwm & Topsis Methodology | Expert Systems with Applications, 250 (2024) |
| 6697 | 0.869 | Anjum M.; Min H.; Sharma G.; Ahmed Z. | Advancing Sustainable Urban Development: Navigating Complexity With Spherical Fuzzy Decision Making | Symmetry, 16, 6 (2024) |
| 50162 | 0.864 | Kamran M.; Ashraf S.; Salamat N.; Naeem M.; Hameed M.S. | Smart City Design Plan Selection Through Single-Valued Neutrosophic Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Rough Aggregation Information | Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 45, 6 (2023) |
| 14323 | 0.86 | Krishankumar R.; Pamucar D.; Cavallaro F.; Ravichandran K.S. | Clean Energy Selection For Sustainable Development By Using Entropy-Based Decision Model With Hesitant Fuzzy Information | Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 28 (2022) |
| 3040 | 0.86 | Mrówczyńska M.; Skiba M.; Leśniak A.; Bazan-Krzywoszańska A.; Janowiec F.; Sztubecka M.; Grech R.; Kazak J.K. | A New Fuzzy Model Of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Based On Bayesian Networks For The Urban Areas' Decarbonization Planning | Energy Conversion and Management, 268 (2022) |
| 2168 | 0.86 | Demircan B.G.; Yetilmezsoy K. | A Hybrid Fuzzy Ahp-Topsis Approach For Implementation Of Smart Sustainable Waste Management Strategies | Sustainability (Switzerland), 15, 8 (2023) |