Smart City Gnosys
Smart city article details
| Title | The Smart Park Evaluation Method That Takes Into Account Common Ground And Individual Characteristics; [兼顾共性基础与个性特色的智慧园区评价方法] |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 56861 |
| Authors | Guo H.; Wangweixi; Li X.; Tang S.; Deng Y. |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Journal of Geo-Information Science, 24, 6 |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210815 |
| Abstract | As an important component and microcosm of a smart city, the construction of a smart park is very important, and the evaluation method is a key element in assessing the level of construction and promoting the healthy development of the park. At present, with the rapid development of the new generation of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and the implementation of advanced concepts such as total life cycle management, the construction and development of smart parks are flourishing. However, little attention has been paid to the evaluation methods that are integrated with them, and there are problems such as slow iteration and single type, which may affect the objective evaluation of the development level of smart parks. In view of this, this study proposes the Commonality Combined with Individuality (CCI) smart park evaluation method, which takes into account the commonality basis and individuality characteristics, based on the advanced inheritance of the original method. The CCI evaluation index system consists of 8 primary indicators, 30 secondary indicators, and 63 tertiary indicators. The common evaluation indicators are the basic indicators common to all parks, which are mandatory and fully integrate the concept of total life cycle management, and are based on the basic structure of the foundation layer - platform layer - application layer of the top-level design of the smart park. The individual evaluation indicators are the characteristic indicators unique to individual parks, which are optional and need to be analyzed according to the actual industrial production process or business content of the park. At the same time, using Shenzhen Smart Ma Wan as an study case, the CCI evaluation index system is constructed and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied to carry out a comprehensive evaluation, and development recommendations are given in conjunction with the evaluation results: the overall level of Smart Ma Wan is high, which is in line with its target positioning of becoming a benchmark for smart cities in early demonstration zones. However, there is still some room for improvement in the areas of smart platform, smart logistics, smart finance, and smart culture and creativity. Finally, the consistency of the evaluation results with the actual situation of Smart Ma Wan demonstrates the scientific and feasibility of the CCI Smart Park evaluation methodology. © 2022, Science Press. All right reserved. |
| Author Keywords | Analytic hierarchy process; CCI; Commonality combined with individuality; Evaluation index system; Full life cycle; Smart park; Top-level design |
Similar Articles
| Id | Similarity | Authors | Title | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
3137  | 0.866 | Yan W.; Sun L.; Ma L.; He L.; Liu W. | A New Smart City Construction Performance Evaluation System From The Perspective Of User Experience: An Empirical Study Of Qingdao, China | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 14709 LNCS (2024) |
| 24732 | 0.864 | Yang T.; Xie C.; Pang Y.; Shang J.; Huang D. | Evaluation Index System Of Smart Parking Driven By New-Quality Productivity And The “Smart Parking Development Index” | Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 65 (2025) |
| 29485 | 0.862 | Shi, HB; Tsai, SB; Lin, XW; Zhang, TY | How To Evaluate Smart Cities' Construction? A Comparison Of Chinese Smart City Evaluation Methods Based On Psf | SUSTAINABILITY, 10, 1 (2018) |
| 19428 | 0.861 | Wang A.; Yang Y.; Sun S.; Zuo Y.; Wang Z.; Sun H. | Developing An Evaluation Model To Measure The Intelligence Level Of Smart Industrial Parks | Buildings, 12, 10 (2022) |
| 5743 | 0.861 | Turna N.; Bhandari H. | A Value Criteria Approach To Incorporate Smart Technology In Urban Parks | 2023 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies for Smart Nation, SmartTechCon 2023 (2023) |
| 24957 | 0.86 | Li, CM; Dai, ZX; Liu, XL; Sun, W | Evaluation System: Evaluation Of Smart City Shareable Framework And Its Applications In China | SUSTAINABILITY, 12, 7 (2020) |
| 24950 | 0.857 | Zhang Y.; Zhang Y.; Zhang H.; Zhang Y. | Evaluation On New First-Tier Smart Cities In China Based On Entropy Method And Topsis | Ecological Indicators, 145 (2022) |
| 24954 | 0.856 | Yuan J.; Wang Z.; Xing S.; Kim C. | Evaluation Study On The Smart And Interactive Landscape Design Of Haiyuntai Waterfront Park From The Perspective Of A Sustainable City | Land, 14, 2 (2025) |
| 2096 | 0.856 | Shen, LY; Huang, ZH; Wong, SW; Liao, SJ; Lou, YL | A Holistic Evaluation Of Smart City Performance In The Context Of China | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 200 (2018) |
| 4953 | 0.856 | Yang J. | A Study And Comparative Analysis Of The Intelligent Park Operation Platform | Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1655 CCIS (2022) |