Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Smart City Policy And Urban Public Service Delivery: A Quantitative Study Under The Background Of Covid-19 Pandemic
ID_Doc 56829
Authors Xu N.; Chen D.
Year 2025
Published Lex Localis, 23, 1
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.52152/23.1.28-53(2025)
Abstract The aim of this study is to empirically investigate the contributions of smart city policy (SCP) in promoting urban public service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effect of the pandemic on urban public service delivery is evaluated using a continuous difference-in-differences (DID) methodology based on a sample of 200 cities in China. On that basis, a triple-difference (DDD) model is built to evaluate the mitigation effect of SCP. The results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly hindered urban public service delivery. SCP is capable of significantly mitigating the negative effect of the pandemic on urban public service delivery. Moreover, cities with a larger scale and better location advantage are subjected to a more significant mitigation effect of SCP, as revealed by the heterogeneity analysis results. The findings of this study provide useful empirical evidence for policy-makers and urban planners and significant practical implications for facilitating smart city construction and boosting urban public service delivery in the future. © 2025, Institute for Local Self-Government Maribor. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords COVID-19; mitigation effect; policy evaluation; smart city policy; urban public service delivery


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
50036 View0.886Rachmawati R.; Wulan Mei E.T.; Haryono E.; Reinhart H.; Ghiffari R.A.; Rohmah A.A.; Saralah T.; Pradipa H.; Nurani I.W.; Petre A.A.Smart City Approaches To Public Spaces And Services During And After Covid-19: Case Studies In Four Capital CitiesIndonesian Journal of Geography, 55, 3 (2023)
20119 View0.884Zaman R.; Choi B.-Y.; Song S.Digital Transformation And Divide Of Cities Through The Covid-19 PandemicISC2 2022 - 8th IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (2022)
20836 View0.883Pratama A.B.; Amber H.; Shershunovich Y.; Castro A.B.R.D.Do Smart Cities Perform Better In Governing The Covid-19 Crisis? Empirical Evidence From Indonesian CitiesUrban Governance, 3, 1 (2023)
50434 View0.882Yang, SS; Chong, ZHSmart City Projects Against Covid-19: Quantitative Evidence From ChinaSUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 70 (2021)
16012 View0.88Sharifi A.; Khavarian-Garmsir A.R.; Kummitha R.K.R.Contributions Of Smart City Solutions And Technologies To Resilience Against The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Literature ReviewSustainability (Switzerland), 13, 14 (2021)
31617 View0.878Rachmawati, R; Mei, ETW; Nurani, IW; Ghiffari, RA; Rohmah, AA; Sejati, MAInnovation In Coping With The Covid-19 Pandemic: The Best Practices From Five Smart Cities In IndonesiaSUSTAINABILITY, 13, 21 (2021)
55393 View0.875Putri S.P.The Effect Of Smart City Innovations Toward The Level Of Household'S Resilience In Surabaya Against Covid-19 PandemicAIP Conference Proceedings, 3048, 1 (2024)
50403 View0.875Vladimirovna Kalinina O.; Evgenievich Barykin S.; Mikhailovich Sergeev S.; NikolaevnaSemenova G.; Fatkullina A.; Mikhaylov A.; De La Poza Plaza E.Smart City Perspectives In Post-Pandemic Governance: Externalities Reduction PolicyF1000Research, 11 (2022)
46039 View0.872Quintero M.R.; Sharifi A.Resilient Smart Cities: Contributions To Pandemic Control And Other Co-BenefitsUrban Book Series (2022)
13001 View0.871Choi C.Building Back Better: Distribution Dynamics In Post-Pandemic Urban ResilienceJournal of Distribution Science, 22, 4 (2024)