Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Sensor Desert Quandary: What Does It Mean (Not) To Count In The Smart City?
ID_Doc 56723
Authors Robinson, C; Franklin, RS
Year 2021
Published TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 46, 2
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tran.12415
Abstract As a central component of the smart city, sensor infrastructures locate and measure a wide range of variables in order to characterise the urban environment. Perhaps the most visible expression of the smart city, sensor deployment is a key equity concern. As new sensor technologies and Big Data interact with social processes, they have the potential to reproduce well-documented spatial injustices. Contrary to promises of providing new knowledge and data for cities, they can also create new gaps in understanding about specific urban populations that fall into the interstices of data collection - sensor deserts. Building on emerging data justice debates, specifically considering distributional, recognition, and procedural forms of injustice, we conceptualise and analyse sensor deserts through two case studies, Newcastle's Urban Observatory (UK) and Chicago's Array of Things (USA). Open sensor locations are integrated with small-area, socio-economic data to evidence the demographic configuration and spatialities of sensor deserts across each city. We illustrate how the structural processes via which inequality is reinforced by smart agendas manifest as uneven social and spatial outcomes. In doing so, the paper opens up a new conceptual space in which to consider what it means (not) to count in the smart city, bringing a demographic perspective to critical debates about smart urbanisms.
Author Keywords data justice; recognition; sensor desert; smart cities; spatial analysis; spatial inequality


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
31543 View0.885Houston D.; McLean J.; Osborne N.Infrastructural Frictions: Care, Shadows, And Ruins In Multispecies Smart CitiesDesigning More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation (2024)
16799 View0.884Masoni A.Cultural Biases In The Smart City: Implications And ChallengesAdvances in Science, Technology and Innovation (2024)
45137 View0.88Visvizi, A; Lytras, MDRescaling And Refocusing Smart Cities Research: From Mega Cities To Smart VillagesJOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY MANAGEMENT, 9, 2 (2018)
48439 View0.879D’Ignazio C.; Gordon E.; Christoforetti E.Sensors And Civics: Toward A Community-Centered Smart CityThe Right to the Smart City (2019)
37263 View0.876Tony Santhosh G.Mobile Crowdsensing And Remote Sensing In Smart Cities: An IntroductionInternet of Things, Part F4006 (2025)
29653 View0.874Resch B.; Szell M.Human-Centric Data Science For Urban StudiesISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8, 12 (2019)
49440 View0.874Baji, PSmart Cities And Their Domains - Future Challenges For Urban Researchers?TER ES TARSADALOM, 31, 1 (2017)
49443 View0.871Guma P.K.Smart Cities And Their Settings In The Global South: Informality As A MarkerDialogues in Human Geography, 14, 3 (2024)
49398 View0.871Durga K.S.; Murty A.V.N.; Kesalu S.V.; Chandra D.; Mishra P.; Upadhyay M.; Rao A.V.S.S.R.Smart Cities And Social Equity: A Data Science Perspective On Urban DevelopmentJournal of Applied Bioanalysis, 11, 3 (2025)
12837 View0.871Houston, L; Gabrys, J; Pritchard, HBreakdown In The Smart City: Exploring Workarounds With Urban-Sensing Practices And TechnologiesSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 44, 5 (2019)