Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Potential Of Location-Based Social Networks For Participatory Urban Planning
ID_Doc 56249
Authors Martí P.; Pérez del Hoyo R.; Nolasco-Cirugeda A.; Serrano-Estrada L.; García-Mayor C.
Year 2021
Published Smart Cities and the UN SDGs
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85151-0.00008-7
Abstract Active citizen participation in urban decision-making processes has proven to be of great value for better aligning population needs with urban planning proposals. However, in many cases, citizens frequently fail to actively participate in these planning processes. The emergence on the political agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular “Objective 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities,” offers urban planners the opportunity to reflect upon current strategies and tools to achieve more participatory and inclusive processes. In order to take a step forward in this direction, this chapter studies the potential of five location-based social networks—Twitter, Instagram, Foursquare, Strava, and MapMyRun—to inform and improve urban planning processes. Within the context of smart cities, the main objective of this work is to present the advantages of incorporating the user-generated information offered by these sources into decision-making processes to encourage smarter, participatory, and inclusive urban planning and management. © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords Citizen participation; Inclusive city; Location-based social networks; Smart city; Smart urban planning


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
14258 View0.887Moreno-Ibarra M.; Torres-Ruiz M.Civic Participation In Smart Cities: The Role Of Social MediaSmart Cities: Issues and Challenges Mapping Political, Social and Economic Risks and Threats (2019)
56664 View0.878De Falco C.C.; Romeo E.The Role Of Social Platform In The Constitution Of Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature ReviewSpringer Proceedings in Complexity (2023)
26968 View0.875Monachesi P.Fostering Sustainable Urban Futures Through Twitter Public SpaceUrban Sustainability, Part F3685 (2023)
60191 View0.87Cai Z.; Kwak Y.; Cvetkovic V.; Deal B.; Mörtberg U.Urban Spatial Dynamic Modeling Based On Urban Amenity Data To Inform Smart City PlanningAnthropocene, 42 (2023)
27289 View0.868Vilenskii M.From Smart City To Smart Urban Spaces: Prerequisites For The Formation Of Smart Urban Spaces Based On The Participation Of Residents In The Largest Cities Of RussiaSmart Spaces: a volume in Intelligent Data-Centric Systems (2024)
59003 View0.866Han, ZY; Ja'afar, NH; Abd Malek, MI; Lyu, YTrends, Obstacles, And Opportunities For Smart Cities In Urban Space: A Systematic Literature ReviewTOWN AND REGIONAL PLANNING, 86 (2025)
20067 View0.863Akers M.A.A.Digital Placemaking: An Analysis Of Citizen Participation In Smart CitiesSmart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 294 (2022)
49304 View0.862Blasi S.; Gobbo E.; Sedita S.R.Smart Cities And Citizen Engagement: Evidence From Twitter Data Analysis On Italian MunicipalitiesJournal of Urban Management, 11, 2 (2022)
42218 View0.862Katmada A.; Katsavounidou G.; Kakderi C.Platform Urbanism For SustainabilityLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 14037 LNCS (2023)
20090 View0.862Angelidou M.; Psaltoglou A.Digital Social Innovation In Support Of Spatial Planning. An Investigation Through Nine Initiatives In Three Smart City ProgrammesSpatium, 39 (2018)