Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title The Evaluation And Significance Of Smart City Projects In Korea: Targeting Enterprises Within The Smart City Association Convergence Alliance
ID_Doc 55483
Authors Kim J.
Year 2024
Published Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16, 7
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su16072697
Abstract This study identified, analysed, and prioritised significant factors for standardising the Korean smart city project evaluation system. We analysed the efficiency and productivity of companies currently providing smart city services, considering both policy and practical aspects. The prioritisation of smart city planning reflects the latest trends in South Korea, where urban planning is moving towards smart city planning. Furthermore, public–private and private–private partnership capacity-building highlights the importance of business scalability. This shows that smart city services are only stabilised when the private sector is involved in and leads the project, rather than focusing on public development. The feasibility of building intelligent facilities indicates that smart city projects should be implemented after securing cost–benefit feasibility. The results were used as the basis for an evaluation system, showing that, in smart city convergence alliances, small- and medium-sized enterprises achieved the highest efficiency by reducing inputs to 81% and 86% under the assumptions of constant and variable returns to scales, respectively. As the operational aspect is more problematic than the technical aspect, policy alternatives are necessary for smooth business progress, including increased flexibility of laws and institutions and the activation of policies that temporarily relieve regulations for smart city projects. © 2024 by the author.
Author Keywords data envelopment analysis; evaluation system; operational efficiency; smart city; smart city convergence alliance enterprises


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
43739 View0.9Quan X.; Solheim M.C.W.Public-Private Partnerships In Smart Cities: A Critical Survey And Research AgendaCity, Culture and Society, 32 (2023)
57987 View0.9Lee, JH; Hancock, MG; Hu, MCTowards An Effective Framework For Building Smart Cities: Lessons From Seoul And San FranciscoTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 89 (2014)
8649 View0.899Ahn Y.An Investigation Of Smart City Development Implementation In Korea: Barriers, Potential And FutureLecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 442 (2024)
56776 View0.887Siokas, G; Kelaidi, V; Tsakanikas, AThe Smart City As A Hub For Nourishing Public-Private PartnershipsSUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 76 (2022)
19350 View0.886Kim S.-C.; Hong P.; Lee T.; Lee A.; Park S.-H.Determining Strategic Priorities For Smart City Development: Case Studies Of South Korean And International Smart CitiesSustainability (Switzerland), 14, 16 (2022)
13160 View0.885Kanellos N.; Siokas G.Business Activities In Smart Cities Of Greece: A Qualitative StudySpringer Proceedings in Business and Economics (2021)
5525 View0.885Perboli, G; Rosano, MA Taxonomic Analysis Of Smart City Projects In North America And EuropeSUSTAINABILITY, 12, 18 (2020)
56796 View0.883Choi, C; Choi, J; Kim, C; Lee, DThe Smart City Evolution In South Korea: Findings From Big Data AnalyticsJOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 7, 1 (2020)
49697 View0.883Kowalski A.M.; Karaś J.Smart Cities Through Innovation Clusters: Insights From Seoul, South KoreaSmart Cities in Europe and Asia: Urban Planning and Management for a Sustainable Future (2023)
51783 View0.882Mora L.; Deakin M.; Reid A.Smart-City Development Paths: Insights From The First Two Decades Of ResearchGreen Energy and Technology, 0, 9783319757735 (2018)