Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Stereo Imagery Based Depth Sensing In Diverse Outdoor Environments: Practical Considerations
ID_Doc 53032
Authors Zhang Y.; Caspi A.
Year 2019
Published Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/EIGSCC Symposium on Smart Cities and Communities, SCC 2019
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3357492.3358627
Abstract Urban mapping for street-side environments (i.e., sidewalk environments rather than auto-centric ones) is just one of many new applications requiring simultaneous object detection and localization in outdoor scenes. Automated mapping has focused on car environments in support of vehicle travel, though pedestrian infrastructure maps, historical structure maps and recreational trail maps are as important in supporting urban life. Unfortunately, many of the auto-centric automated approaches cannot be leveraged in other outdoor use cases due to challenging and cost-prohibitive depth sensing hardware involving LiDar sensors and large computing resources. Using depth-sensing stereo cameras is cost-efficient, but little information is available detailing the best uses and efficacy of different systems in diverse outdoor environments. Our review highlights the complexity of localizing objects in real outdoor environments using stereo cameras and our comparative analysis approach to two common camera setups demonstrates the variation among depth-sensing cameras. We collect a modest dataset with side-by-side images for comparing two commonly used depth cameras, the ZED Stereo Camera (a passive stereo camera) and Intel® RealSense Depth Camera D435 (an active IR stereo camera). We contrast system performance in diverse urban environments, and provide accuracy of depth measurement results based on data collected from each stereo sensor. We focus our discussion on practical considerations and objects that are commonly presented in the street environment but usually hard to map by hand. © 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
Author Keywords Depth sensing; First-last-mile; Image processing; Nonmotorized transportation; Object detection; Pedestrian mapping


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
40178 View0.86Blaser S.; Meyer J.; Nebiker S.Open Urban And Forest Datasets From A High-Performance Mobile Mapping Backpack - A Contribution For Advancing The Creation Of Digital City TwinsInternational Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 43, B1-2021 (2021)
33411 View0.859Barra S.; Marras M.; Mohamed S.; Podda A.S.; Saia R.Investigating The Effectiveness Of 3D Monocular Object Detection Methods For Roadside ScenariosProceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2024)
20535 View0.857Wang X.; Jiang L.; Wang F.; You H.; Xiang Y.Disparity Refinement For Stereo Matching Of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based On Gis DataRemote Sensing, 16, 3 (2024)
211 View0.852Zhao J.; Chen Y.; Li Y.; Xu H.; Xu J.; Li X.; Zhang H.; Jin L.; Xu S.4D+ City Sidewalk: Integrating Pedestrian View Into Sidewalk Spaces To Support User-Centric Urban Spatial PerceptionSensors, 25, 5 (2025)
14765 View0.851Blaschke T.; Hay G.J.; Weng Q.; Resch B.Collective Sensing: Integrating Geospatial Technologies To Understand Urban Systems-An OverviewRemote Sensing, 3, 8 (2011)
23943 View0.851Park J.; Lee S.; Cho P.H.; Xia Z.; Hebbache L.Enhancing Sidewalk Maintenance Through Accurate Joint Deflection MeasurementDigest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (2025)