Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Smartocracy: Context Entanglement Of The Smart City Idea And Bureaucracy In Russia
ID_Doc 51881
Authors Khodachek I.; Aleksandrov E.; Nazarova N.; Grossi G.; Bourmistrov A.
Year 2023
Published Organization Studies, 44, 10
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01708406221123373
Abstract This paper explores how the smart city idea unfolds in the bureaucratic context. Applying a qualitative approach and the Scandinavian stream of translation theory, we investigate the case of cities' 'smartification' in Russia during 2017-2020. Tracking mechanisms and outcomes of translation, we see the encounter of the smart city idea and bureaucracy as context entanglement, with smartocracy as an epilogue. Context entanglement refers to the mutual co-translation of the smart city idea and bureaucracy by means of formal and informal mechanisms, implying that what happens with bureaucracy or the smart city cannot be fully described without considering what happens with the other. Smart city vagueness and complexity appear to be both strengths and weaknesses that can be compensated for by bureaucracy as the smart city assemblage point. Smartocracy appears as a new way to organize cities whereby bureaucracy deals with smart city creatively: it keeps the core of bureaucracy while simultaneously reinforcing it and isolating some complex idea elements for later translation. This approach helps keep bureaucracy as a rational form of city modernization while maintaining smart cities' promise to improve urban futures.
Author Keywords bureaucracy; context entanglement; Russia; smart city; smartocracy; translation


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
11916 View0.876Mittal H.; Kandathil G.; Mathur N.Beyond The Technology-Centric And Citizen-Centric Binary: Ontological Politics Of Organizing In Translation Of The Smart City Discourse In IndiaOrganization, 31, 4 (2024)
36912 View0.874Zaman S.; Hertweck C.Methods For Uncovering Discourses That Shape The Urban Imaginary In Helsinki'S Smart CityFrontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4 (2022)
62198 View0.872Turgel I.; Bozhko L.; Ulyanova E.‘Smart City’ Concept In Digital Economics: Practice Of Russia And KazakhstanInternational Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 16, 2-4 (2022)
49886 View0.872Visvizi A.; Godlewska-Majkowska H.Smart Cities: Lock-In, Path-Dependence And Non-Linearity Of Digitalization And SmartificationSmart Cities: Lock-in, Path-dependence and Non-linearity of Digitalization and Smartification (2024)
43354 View0.87Gabrys J.Programming Environments: Environmentality And Citizen Sensing In The Smart CitySmart Urbanism: Utopian vision or false dawn? (2015)
37767 View0.87Sadowski, J; Maalsen, SModes Of Making Smart Cities: Or, Practices Of Variegated Smart UrbanismTELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 55 (2020)
61296 View0.87Trunova O.; Khodachek I.; Khodachek A.Visualising And Calculating The Smart City: A Dialogue PerspectiveJournal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34, 5 (2022)
13140 View0.87Lekkas C.-K.; Souitaris V.Bureaucracy Meets Digital Reality: The Unfolding Of Urban Platforms In European Municipal GovernmentsOrganization Studies, 44, 10 (2023)
27303 View0.868Costales E.; Zeyen A.From Social Interaction To Societal Discourse: An Ordonomic Analysis Of The Smart CityCities, 161 (2025)
56791 View0.868Volkov S.K.; Morozova I.A.; Gladkaya E.A.; Akimova O.E.; Kuzlaeva I.M.The Smart City Concept In Russia: Problems Of Transition And Humanization Of The Digital Environment From The Perspective Of The Quality Of Public AdministrationInternational Journal for Quality Research, 17, 2 (2023)