Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Smart Cities At Risk: Systemic Risk Drivers In The Blind Spot Of Long-Term Governance
ID_Doc 49510
Authors Ottenburger S.S.; Ufer U.
Year 2023
Published Risk Analysis, 43, 11
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.14102
Abstract In this article, we analyze "digital massification" in smart cities, that is, an ever-growing number of market participants, consumers, and Internet of Things devices with simultaneous accommodation of users to increasing disturbances and inconveniences due to data congestion-as a driver for systemic risk. We argue that digital massification phenomena largely escape societal awareness due to their protracted evolution and are therefore still in the blind spot of long-term governance. Our analysis makes methodological use of historical and relational analogy, and we introduce and elaborate concepts and terms that allow us to discuss the evolutionary nature of massification, that is, the foreseeable increasing probability of the occurrence of trigger events. Using the analogy to the history of road traffic congestion, we deduce that digital massification will most likely lead to a future "risk transition" where tolerated disturbances and inconveniences of the present will turn into systemic impacts. This insight calls for heightened sensitivity in governance to massification phenomena to ensure the long-term resilience of smart cities.
Author Keywords critical services; data congestion; long-term governance; risk evolution; smart city; systemic risk drivers


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
61879 View0.882Mendle R.S.; Hartung A.Wielding A Concept With Two Edges: How To Make Use Of The Smart Cities Concept And Understanding Its Risks From The Resilient Cities PerspectiveUrban Book Series (2022)
49496 View0.88Mondschein, J; Clark-Ginsberg, A; Kuehn, ASmart Cities As Large Technological Systems: Overcoming Organizational Challenges In Smart Cities Through Collective ActionSUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 67 (2021)
55542 View0.879Shayan S.; Kim K.P.; Ma T.; Nguyen T.H.D.The First Two Decades Of Smart City Research From A Risk PerspectiveSustainability (Switzerland), 12, 21 (2020)
50261 View0.877Mora L.; Gerli P.; Ardito L.; Messeni Petruzzelli A.Smart City Governance From An Innovation Management Perspective: Theoretical Framing, Review Of Current Practices, And Future Research AgendaTechnovation, 123 (2023)
46678 View0.876Ullah, F; Qayyum, S; Thaheem, MJ; Al-Turjman, F; Sepasgozar, SMERisk Management In Sustainable Smart Cities Governance: A Toe FrameworkTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 167 (2021)
52958 View0.873Umeike R.; Dao T.; Crawford S.State-Of-The-Art Review Of Resilient Smart Cities: Progress And ChallengesUrban Governance, 5, 2 (2025)
12862 View0.872Nassar J.B.; Sharp D.; Anwar M.; Bartram L.; Goodwin S.Bridging Data Governance And Socio-Technical Transitions To Understand Sustainable Smart CitiesJournal of Urban Technology, 31, 4-5 (2024)
49768 View0.871Nanayakkara N.D.G.T.; Nanayakkara G.A.S.Y.; Karunanayaka K.M.C.M.; Kumara C.P.T.K.; Karunanayake N.Smart Cities, Secure Data: Navigating The Evolving Landscape Of Data Protection ChallengesData Protection: The Wake of AI and Machine Learning (2025)
28168 View0.871Przeybilovicz E.; Cunha M.A.Governing In The Digital Age: The Emergence Of Dynamic Smart Urban Governance ModesGovernment Information Quarterly, 41, 1 (2024)
21717 View0.871Ooms, W; Caniëls, MCJ; Roijakkers, N; Cobben, DEcosystems For Smart Cities: Tracing The Evolution Of Governance Structures In A Dutch Smart City InitiativeINTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 16, 4 (2020)