Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Secure Itemset Hiding In Smart City Sensor Data
ID_Doc 47652
Authors Srivastava G.; Lin J.C.-W.; Lin G.
Year 2024
Published Cluster Computing, 27, 2
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10586-023-04000-2
Abstract Sensor data that is often collected in the Internet of Things (IoT) or any smart city environment should be protected against security and privacy concerns. Often, sensor data that is shared by devices in smart cities contains sensitive or private information that can often be shared over different networks and by different smart applications. In the last decade, the area of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining (PPDM) has received a lot of attention as the amount of data received and collected daily is huge. Unfortunately, PPDM mostly applies to binary data. To improve the usefulness of PPDM, we present a more usable version for smart cities called Privacy-Preserving Utility Mining (PPUM), in the form of a Maximal Sensitive Utility-Maximal Sensitive ConflIct (MSU-MSI) algorithm. MSU-MSI finds any conflicting items that may contain sensitive itemsets with high-utility and sanitizes them, stripping them of sensitive and private information while maintaining utility. Any transactions encountered that contain sensitive itemsets are first fed through sanitization processes. This is followed by calculating the total number of items that conflict, and then removing them so sanitization processes can operate more efficiently so as to not redo known sanitization processes. We conduct an in-depth experimental analysis, where our detailed methodology is compared directly with state-of-the-art frameworks such as MSU-MIU, MSU-MAU, HHUIF and MSCIF. Our proposed MSU-MSI shows a higher performance in missing cost, in particular when dealing with highly dense or highly sparse datasets. Moreover, our novel framework is shown to achieve an excellent performance with regards to similarity in database structure and database utility. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023.
Author Keywords Privacy preservation; Remote sensing data; Security; Smart cities; Utility mining


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
43171 View0.885Sei Y.Privacy-Preserving Data Collection And Analysis For Smart CitiesHuman-Centered Services Computing for Smart Cities: IEICE Monograph (2024)
43141 View0.865Qi, LY; Hu, CH; Zhang, XY; Khosravi, MR; Sharma, S; Pang, SN; Wang, TPrivacy-Aware Data Fusion And Prediction With Spatial-Temporal Context For Smart City Industrial EnvironmentIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 17, 6 (2021)
54531 View0.865Aldeen Y.A.A.S.; Salleh M.Techniques For Privacy Preserving Data Publication In The Cloud For Smart City ApplicationsSmart Cities Cybersecurity and Privacy (2018)
43173 View0.859Chakraborty N.; Sharma A.; Dutta J.; Kumar H.D.Privacy-Preserving Data Quality Assessment For Time-Series Iot SensorsProceedings of 2024 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems, IoTaIS 2024 (2024)
1725 View0.855Khan M.A.A Formal Method For Privacy-Preservation In Cognitive Smart CitiesExpert Systems, 39, 5 (2022)
709 View0.851Zheng, X; Tian, L; Luo, GC; Cai, ZPA Collaborative Mechanism For Private Data Publication In Smart CitiesIEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 7, 9 (2020)