Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Reimagining Smart City Collaboration In Colombo, Sri Lanka After Gilbert Simondon
ID_Doc 44865
Authors Liyanage K.
Year 2024
Published Australian Geographer, 55, 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2024.2389598
Abstract Most cities across the globe are embarking on various ‘smart’-based initiatives that seek to use technological developments to enhance people’s lives and make society more productive. Within such smart cities, citizens are often expected to become active ‘collaborators’ in producing smartness. Such technocratic forms of collaboration maintain entrenched forms of hierarchical power, with citizens usually figured as passive ‘consumers’ or ‘users’ of smart technologies rather than as real transformative participants. In this paper, I explore how ‘collaboration’ in the smart city might be thought of differently in ways that challenge the more utilitarian senses that dominate much political and academic discussion. I do this through an engagement with Gilbert Simondon’s philosophy of individuation and technology. In particular, I explore the distinction he draws between ‘interindividual’ and ‘transindividual’ modes of relation and how they entail different political senses of what collaboration between humans and technologies might entail. I flesh this out by drawing on interview research with stakeholders and citizens in Colombo, Sri Lanka. I highlight how stakeholders and citizens imagine collaboration and how these imaginaries explore alternate ways of living in and relating to smart urbanism and smart mobilities today. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Author Keywords collaboration; Gilbert Simondon; smart citizens; Smart city; technology; transindividual


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
55102 View0.901Thabit S.; Mora L.The Collaboration Dilemma In Smart City Projects: Time To Ask The Right QuestionsOrganization, 31, 7 (2024)
33183 View0.896Burns R.; Welker P.Interstitiality In The Smart City: More Than Top-Down And Bottom-Up SmartnessUrban Studies, 60, 2 (2023)
36912 View0.893Zaman S.; Hertweck C.Methods For Uncovering Discourses That Shape The Urban Imaginary In Helsinki'S Smart CityFrontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4 (2022)
52110 View0.892Kolodii, NA; Ivanova, VS; Chernova, DASociocentrism Versus Technocentrism In Smart City ResearchVESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 80 (2024)
51683 View0.891Cardullo, P; Kitchin, RSmart Urbanism And Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic Of 'Citizen-Focused' Smart Cities In EuropeENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 37, 5 (2019)
50103 View0.887Mills D.E.; Izadgoshasb I.; Pudney S.G.Smart City Collaboration: A Review And An Agenda For Establishing Sustainable CollaborationSustainability (Switzerland), 13, 16 (2021)
27303 View0.887Costales E.; Zeyen A.From Social Interaction To Societal Discourse: An Ordonomic Analysis Of The Smart CityCities, 161 (2025)
60023 View0.885Sepehr P.; Felt U.Urban Imaginaries As Tacit Governing Devices: The Case Of Smart City ViennaScience Technology and Human Values, 50, 2 (2025)
38939 View0.884Yeo S.J.I.Negotiating Digital Urban Futures: The Limits And Possibilities Of Future-Making In SingaporeTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49, 2 (2024)
11916 View0.883Mittal H.; Kandathil G.; Mathur N.Beyond The Technology-Centric And Citizen-Centric Binary: Ontological Politics Of Organizing In Translation Of The Smart City Discourse In IndiaOrganization, 31, 4 (2024)