Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Recognizing Intra-Urban Disparities In Smart Cities: An Example From Poland
ID_Doc 44622
Authors Maleszyk P.
Year 2021
Published Smart Cities and the UN SDGs
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85151-0.00011-7
Abstract “Smart, i.e., ICT-enhanced, governance” is one of the key objectives urban authorities seek to implement today. However, a significant cross-country heterogeneity with respect to the perception, implementation, and outcomes of smart governance can be observed. This chapter discusses the application of a smart tool for recognizing neighborhood satisfaction implemented in Lublin (Poland). The chapter also presents broader patterns in “smart city” development in Poland and then specifically in Lublin. In this way, it contributes to the discussion on addressing intra-urban inequalities, seen as a part of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The data was gathered from residents who took part in online voting on participatory budget projects and who were asked to assess the public amenities in their neighborhoods. Given the fact that the participants accounted for 2% of the urban population, the research allows us to recognize differences in neighborhood satisfaction within urban areas—a problem that is difficult to address empirically and thus rarely explored, yet critical in efforts to make urban areas more inclusive and sustainable. The results show that Lublin is not affected by strong spatial inequalities in terms of residential satisfaction with public goods provision, while existing moderate differences concern mainly infrastructure for urban mobility, air quality, and sports facilities and amenities. We identify some spatial patterns in neighborhood satisfaction and compare the results with insights from objective data. We also consider how our tool might contribute to the “smart governance” concept and to the sustainable spatial development of urban areas. © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Author Keywords Intra-urban inequalities; Neighborhood satisfaction; Poland; Public amenities; Smart governance; Sustainable cities


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
49385 View0.886Roszkowska E.; Wachowicz T.Smart Cities And Resident Well-Being: Using The Btopsis Method To Assess Citizen Life Satisfaction In European CitiesApplied Sciences (Switzerland), 14, 23 (2024)
20870 View0.883Dashkevych O.; Portnov B.A.Does City Smartness Improve Urban Environment And Reduce Income Disparity? Evidence From An Empirical Analysis Of Major Cities WorldwideSustainable Cities and Society, 96 (2023)
10700 View0.88Stanković J.J.; Popović Ž.; Marjanović I.Assessing Smartness And Urban Development Of The European Cities:An Integrated Approach Of Entropy And VikorContributions to Management Science (2021)
49437 View0.88Caragliu A.; Del Bo C.F.Smart Cities And The Urban Digital Dividenpj Urban Sustainability, 3, 1 (2023)
34541 View0.877Lee S.; Park I.K.Key Themes And Conceptual Frameworks For A Smart-Inclusive City: A Scoping ReviewJournal of Planning Literature (2025)
51986 View0.877Kruhlov V.; Dvorak J.Social Inclusivity In The Smart City Governance: Overcoming The Digital DivideSustainability (Switzerland), 17, 13 (2025)
25765 View0.875Geropanta V.; Karagianni A.; Mavroudi S.; Parthenios P.Exploring The Relationship Between The Smart-Sustainable City, Well-Being, And Urban Planning: An Analysis Of Current Approaches In EuropeSmart Cities and the UN SDGs (2021)
15966 View0.871Cheung V.Y.J.; Lin G.C.S.Contextualizing Smart Urbanism: Emergent Geography Of Smartness And Happiness In A Digitalizing WorldApplied Geography, 181 (2025)
28162 View0.871Dhenge V.; Nimbarte G.Governance, Ease Of Living, And Citizens’ Perception: Components For Quality-Of-Life Assessment In Mid-Sized Smart CitiesInternational Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 9, 2 (2024)
59003 View0.869Han, ZY; Ja'afar, NH; Abd Malek, MI; Lyu, YTrends, Obstacles, And Opportunities For Smart Cities In Urban Space: A Systematic Literature ReviewTOWN AND REGIONAL PLANNING, 86 (2025)