Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Participatory Backcasting Towards Desirable Co-Produced Mobility Futures: A Case Study Of Maas In Greater Manchester
ID_Doc 41356
Authors Tantoush M.; Solomou S.; Sengupta U.; Zigure S.
Year 2024
Published Futures, 164
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103463
Abstract Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) has emerged as a model supported by popular discourse on achieving greener, more efficient and equitable future mobility. While technological change is a primary driver for models of development, the policy pathways, implementation and implications of MaaS are complex and unclear. In this paper, we explore the implications and limitations of a participatory approach to co-produced MaaS futures in Greater Manchester (GM). We adapt a backcasting methodology involving two stakeholder workshops to develop shared future visions and action pathways. Our methodology includes a participatory approach to pluralistic vision development and the use of a Three Horizons method for backcasting. This approach provides the opportunity to explore multiple desirable futures and the formulation of action pathways without negating plausible future possibilities. The research identifies multiple policy and collaborative action areas while also revealing limitations in MaaS user agency and unaddressed sustainability concerns related to wider Smart City criticisms. Findings also suggest a lack of adequate theory within current MaaS frameworks to engage with uncertainty, change and adaptive capacity. Future areas of research include the expansion of current frameworks to incorporate alternative framings from planning and complexity theories already attempting to address these dimensions of futures. © 2024 The Authors
Author Keywords Complexity; Mobility-as-a-Service; Participatory Backcasting; Sustainability; Three Horizons


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
35856 View0.913Lopez-Carreiro I.; Monzon A.; Lopez E.Maas Implications In The Smart City: A Multi-Stakeholder ApproachSustainability (Switzerland), 15, 14 (2023)
29504 View0.883Modarelli G.; Sadraei R.; Rainero C.How To Perceive Sustainable Moving And Smart Mobility Today?: A Cross-National Comparative Longitudinal Perspective And The Controversy Of Alternative Transport SystemsJournal of Cleaner Production, 468 (2024)
37380 View0.882Mandžuka B.; Jurčević M.; Vidović K.Mobility-As-A-Service And The Future Of Urban Mobility: A Human-Centered Approach To Multimodal Journey PlanningLecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 687 LNNS (2023)
24629 View0.88Unno G.; Herthogs P.; von Richthofen A.Evaluating The Context-Adaptiveness Of Mobility Visions For Future Smart CitiesLecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 1209 LNEE (2024)
44798 View0.877Rey-Moreno M.; Periáñez-Cristóbal R.; Calvo-Mora A.Reflections On Sustainable Urban Mobility, Mobility As A Service (Maas) And Adoption ModelsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 1 (2023)
37355 View0.876Barreto L.; Amaral A.; Baltazar S.Mobility In The Era Of Digitalization: Thinking Mobility As A Service (Maas)Studies in Computational Intelligence, 864 (2020)
54115 View0.871Bibri S.E.Sustainable, Smart, And Data-Driven Approaches To Urbanism And Their Integrative Aspects: A Qualitative Analysis Of Long-Lasting TrendsAdvances in Science, Technology and Innovation (2019)
13652 View0.868Brownrigg-Gleeson M.L.; Lopez-Carreiro I.; Lopez-Lambas M.E.; Kunnasvirta A.Challenges For Smart Mobility: A Study Of Governance In Three European Metropolitan AreasCities, 157 (2025)
27344 View0.868Costa V.; Delponte I.From Words To Deeds: When Digital App Acceptance Turns Into Sustainable Mobility Behaviours. Methodologies And Insights From Maas ExperiencesUrban, Planning and Transport Research, 13, 1 (2025)
57759 View0.868Bibri S.E.Toward The Integration Of The Data-Driven City, The Eco-City And The Compact City: Constructing A Future Vision Of The Smart Sustainable CityAdvances in Science, Technology and Innovation (2019)