Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Obliged Smart Freedom: The Singaporean Experience Of Advanced Neoliberal-Developmental Governance
ID_Doc 39621
Authors Sobey A.
Year 2023
Published Urban Studies, 60, 16
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00420980231169206
Abstract Despite criticism, the smart city solutionist rhetoric has gained popularity and investment across the world. In response, this paper interrogates the notion of neutrality in smart city projects and investigates the resulting rationales of the smart brand as a technology of control. The paper develops Nikolas Rose’s argument that a central tenet of liberal governance is to create, and then obligate, a desirable form of freedom, through a framework of economic maximisation, self-responsibility and autonomy. This framework is applied to the Singaporean Smart Nation as a neoliberal-developmental state to consider how the Smart City can be understood as a governance technique. The research is undertaken through a mixed method analysis to unpick the discursive frameworks shaping how individuals navigate the smart city. This approach identifies one of the many ways realities have become governable, to provide a relational perspective through the juxtaposition of government and citizen experiences. Data is drawn from three key government documents, an online survey of Singaporean residents (n = 255), and key informant interviews (n = 9). The results demonstrate the potential of the digital environment of Singapore to oblige freedom to engender a compliant population. In addition, the Singaporean case highlights the need for contextualised analysis of smart city projects to explore the governance potential, especially beyond the western perspective. © Urban Studies Journal Limited 2023.
Author Keywords governmentality; obliged freedom; Singapore; smart cities


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
50051 View0.901Lombardi P.; Vanolo A.Smart City As A Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives On Urban Development PoliciesPublic Administration and Information Technology, 8 (2015)
51683 View0.896Cardullo, P; Kitchin, RSmart Urbanism And Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic Of 'Citizen-Focused' Smart Cities In EuropeENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 37, 5 (2019)
56980 View0.891Suartika, GAM; Cuthbert, AThe Sustainable Imperative-Smart Cities, Technology And DevelopmentSUSTAINABILITY, 12, 21 (2020)
31776 View0.889Woods O.; Bunnell T.; Kong L.Insourcing The Smart City: Assembling An Ideo-Technical Ecosystem Of Talent, Skills, And Civic-Mindedness In SingaporeUrban Geography, 45, 5 (2024)
19817 View0.888Joo Y.-M.Developmentalist Smart Cities? The Cases Of Singapore And SeoulInternational Journal of Urban Sciences, 27, S1 (2023)
10601 View0.888Woodier J.; Zingerle A.As Smart Worlds Collide: Citizen Agency And Human Rights In The Smart CityBusiness and Human Rights in Asia: Duty of the State to Protect (2021)
38939 View0.887Yeo S.J.I.Negotiating Digital Urban Futures: The Limits And Possibilities Of Future-Making In SingaporeTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49, 2 (2024)
14110 View0.887Kitchin R.; Cardullo P.; Feliciantonio C.D.Citizenship, Justice, And The Right To The Smart CityThe Right to the Smart City (2019)
50668 View0.886Molchanov M.A.; Molchanova V.Smart City—A Global Project Of Late CapitalismTurning Points of World Transformation: New Trends, Challenges and Actors (2022)
43350 View0.885Tello, AMProgram And Govern. Technological-Political Disputes In The Era Of Smart CitiesARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 198, 803 (2022)