Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title 'Embodiments Of The Invention': Patents And Urban Diagrammatics In The Smart City
ID_Doc 33
Authors Shapiro, A
Year 2020
Published CONVERGENCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO NEW MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 26, 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856520941801
Abstract How do technology firms compete to colonize the urban future? This article theorizes technology patents as a medium of urban futuring. Patents secure legal exclusion by disclosing an idea or invention. However, the incentive structures behind patents are ambiguous. Patent holders must articulate inventions with enough technical specificity to warrant a property claim while remaining strategically imprecise enough to capture unanticipated future uses. I build on the Foucaultian theory of the diagram to discuss patents' interplay of disclosure and secrecy as a strategic anticipatory practice for colonizing urban futures. Whereas modern urban governance operated on spatial form to discipline citizens, smart city technology patents reflect a splintering of technical capacity and control. In the empirical section, I analyze three patent-diagrams: the first for a Wi-Fi-enabled advertising system, the second for a notification system for autonomous vehicles, and the third for an algorithmic predictive policing platform. These examples show that at a fundamental level, smart city technologies are less discrete inventions than claims to the capacity to influence human-machinic interactions. The article concludes with a reflection on how critical urbanists can learn from technology patents to advance more democratic and publicly oriented visions for the city.
Author Keywords Autonomous vehicles; digital out-of-home advertising; futuring media; patents; predictive policing; smart city


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
55072 View0.878Hlongwa L.The City As An Algorithmic Formation: Insights From Patent DataWork Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 14, 1 (2020)
60023 View0.866Sepehr P.; Felt U.Urban Imaginaries As Tacit Governing Devices: The Case Of Smart City ViennaScience Technology and Human Values, 50, 2 (2025)
57551 View0.863Tusikov N.Toronto'S Failed Smart City: Intellectual Property, Data, And Bad GovernanceIneffective Policies: Causes and Consequences of Bad Policy Choices (2025)
24 View0.861Mann, M; Mitchell, P; Foth, M; Anastasiu, I#Blocksidewalkto Barcelona: Technological Sovereignty And The Social License To Operate Smart CitiesJOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 71, 9 (2020)
59647 View0.861Göçoğlu V.; Göksu S.; Kotter R.Unleashing Urban Technology Dynamics: The Interplay Of Ai Patents, Metropolitan Area Population, And R&D Expenditures In Sustainable Urban DevelopmentJournal of Urban Technology, 32, 3 (2025)
56252 View0.858Geenen A.; Matos Castaño J.; van der Voort M.The Potential Of Smart City Controversies To Foster Civic Engagement, Ethical Reflection And Alternative ImaginariesPhilosophy of Engineering and Technology, 45 (2023)
30084 View0.857Wright J.; Weber V.; Walton G.F.Identifying Potential Emerging Human Rights Implications In Chinese Smart Cities Via Machine-Learning Aided Patent AnalysisInternet Policy Review, 12, 3 (2023)
49808 View0.856Angelidou, MSmart Cities: A Conjuncture Of Four ForcesCITIES, 47 (2015)
44533 View0.855Förster N.; Schubert G.; Petzold F.Rebugging The Smart City Design Explorations Of Digital Urban InfrastructureProceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (2022)
58840 View0.854Guma P.K.Transforming The Smart City Ideal From The Margins: Everyday Regimes Of Labour And GovernanceTerritory, Politics, Governance (2025)