Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Dynamics In The Governance Of Smart Cities: Insights From South Korean Smart Cities
ID_Doc 21464
Authors Lim Y.; Edelenbos J.; Gianoli A.
Year 2023
Published International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27, S1
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2063158
Abstract This paper aims to explain how the governance model changes in smart cities by using South Korea's experience as a case study. South Korean smart city development is divided into three phases according to the national master plan and maturity of smart cities. Phase 1 took place from 2008 to 2013, phase 2 extended from 2014 to 2018, and phase 3 began in 2019 and will last into 2023. The cases under consideration are three representative smart cities: Seoul, Songdo, and Sejong. The analysis traces how the governance model of each city changes throughout the three phases. According to stakeholders' roles and relationships, the governance model is categorized into four types (corporate, market, multilevel, and network governance). The governance model in all three cities showed little change. In Seoul and Songdo, market governance was dominant, while in Sejong, multilevel governance was. However, in phase 3, the institutional setting is changing to facilitate network governance in all three cities. The government guided the collaboration, giving more opportunities for private, academic, and civil actors to engage.
Author Keywords collaboration; governance; network governance; Smart city; South Korea


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
57750 View0.895Kwak Y.H.; Lee J.Toward Sustainable Smart City: Lessons From 20 Years Of Korean ProgramsIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70, 2 (2023)
50019 View0.894Yang C.Smart City And The Reinvented Politics Of Governing Through Datafied Environment In Songdo, South KoreaGlobal Transformations in Media and Communication Research (2020)
38646 View0.889Prasad, D; Alizadeh, T; Dowling, RMultiscalar Smart City Governance In IndiaGEOFORUM, 121 (2021)
42322 View0.888Kovalev Y.; Burnasov A.; Ilyushkina M.; Stepanov A.Political Models Of Smart Cities And The Role Of Network Actors In Their Implementation (The Case Of Vienna, Lyon, And New Songdo In Seoul)AIP Conference Proceedings, 2442 (2021)
50937 View0.885AlAwadhi, S; Scholl, HJSmart Governance: A Cross-Case Analysis Of Smart City InitiativesPROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS 2016) (2016)
28168 View0.884Przeybilovicz E.; Cunha M.A.Governing In The Digital Age: The Emergence Of Dynamic Smart Urban Governance ModesGovernment Information Quarterly, 41, 1 (2024)
8649 View0.883Ahn Y.An Investigation Of Smart City Development Implementation In Korea: Barriers, Potential And FutureLecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 442 (2024)
50261 View0.879Mora L.; Gerli P.; Ardito L.; Messeni Petruzzelli A.Smart City Governance From An Innovation Management Perspective: Theoretical Framing, Review Of Current Practices, And Future Research AgendaTechnovation, 123 (2023)
54279 View0.879Liu S.; Wu Y.; Jiang G.; Dong J.System Dynamics Modeling Of Collaborative Governance In Smart Cities: A Case Study Of Dongguan, ChinaScientific Reports, 14, 1 (2024)
57987 View0.876Lee, JH; Hancock, MG; Hu, MCTowards An Effective Framework For Building Smart Cities: Lessons From Seoul And San FranciscoTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 89 (2014)