Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Does Improved Digital Governance In Government Promote Natural Resource Management? Quasi-Natural Experiments Based On Smart City Pilots
ID_Doc 20880
Authors Chen K.; Li Q.; Shoaib M.; Ameer W.; Jiang T.
Year 2024
Published Resources Policy, 90
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104721
Abstract Based on panel data for 281 cities in China from 2007 to 2021, this paper uses the global Malmquist‒Luenberger index to measure natural resource management. Using the smart city pilot as a quasi-natural experiment in government digital governance, the progressive difference-in-differences method was used to investigate whether the government's digital governance capacity promotes green and sustainable development. The main findings are as follows: the improvement of the government's digital governance capacity significantly contributes to green and sustainable development. After a series of placebo tests and robustness tests, the results of this paper still hold. Government digital governance promotes natural resource management mainly through two mechanisms: green technology innovation and intellectual property protection, and the quality of green technology innovation plays a more critical role than quantity. The impact of improved government digital governance on natural resource management varies significantly across different types of cities, cities with different political levels, and cities with different urban locations and human capital levels. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Author Keywords Digital government; Green technology innovation; Natural resource management; Smart city pilots


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
58370 View0.88Xue H.Towards Sustainable Development: Unveiling The Impact Of Digital Government On Urban Low-Carbon Development From A Resource Curse PerspectiveResources Policy, 95 (2024)
55787 View0.88Jiang Z.; Zhang X.; Zhao Y.; Li C.; Wang Z.The Impact Of Urban Digital Transformation On Resource Sustainability: Evidence From A Quasi-Natural Experiment In ChinaResources Policy, 85 (2023)
42303 View0.866El-Sherif D.M.; Khalil E.E.Policy Instruments For Facilitating Smart City GovernanceSmart Cities Policies and Financing: Approaches and Solutions (2022)
50600 View0.864Ma Z.; Wu F.Smart City, Digitalization And Co2 Emissions: Evidence From 353 Cities In ChinaSustainability (Switzerland), 15, 1 (2023)
59456 View0.861Ma Z.; Zhang P.Understanding How Digital Infrastructure Construction Could Promote Sustainable DevelopmentSustainable Cities and Society, 117 (2024)
13928 View0.858Hsu A.; Lili L.; Schletz M.; Yu Z.Chinese Cities As Digital Environmental Governance Innovators: Evidence From Subnational Low-Carbon PlansEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51, 3 (2024)
59990 View0.857Shu Y.; Deng N.; Wu Y.; Bao S.; Bie A.Urban Governance And Sustainable Development: The Effect Of Smart City On Carbon Emission In ChinaTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 193 (2023)
45346 View0.855Zhu Q.Research On Digital Governance In Urban Sustainable DevelopmentProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 12804 (2023)
20813 View0.852Guo X.; Zhang R.; Zhang Y.Do Companies Influenced By Smart Cities Pay More Attention To Green Governance? Mechanism And Optimal Spatial CorrelationChinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 22, 1 (2024)
24819 View0.851Zheng L.; Zhang J.; Liu H.Evaluation Of New Smart Cities And Its Influencing Factors In The Era Of Mobile Internet: Empirical Evidence From ChinaEnvironmental Research Communications, 7, 4 (2025)